No abstract

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Glottic stenosis is a fixed, focal narrowing at the level of the laryngeal inlet, the true vocal cords. It may be either congenital or acquired and be related to a wide range of etiologies. The stenosis may be either anterior, posterior, or in rare cases, complete. Isolated glottic stenosis is rare; lesions often involve adjacent regions, namely the subglottis. A diagnosis is made from careful history and examination, including evaluation by microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy. The management of glottic stenosis is challenging and should be tailored to each individual case. A secure and adequate airway is the treatment priority alongside optimization of voice and laryngeal competence. Endoscopic and open techniques in either single or multiple stages have been described.

Background It has become clear that healthcare workers are at high risk, and otolaryngology has been theorized to be among the highest risk specialties for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). The purpose of this study was to detail the international impact of COVID‐19 among otolaryngologists, and to identify instructional cases. Methods Country representatives of the Young Otolaryngologists–International Federation of Otolaryngologic Societies (YO‐IFOS) surveyed otolaryngologists through various channels. Nationwide surveys were distributed in 19 countries. The gray literature and social media channels were searched to identify reported deaths of otolaryngologists from COVID‐19. Results A total of 361 otolaryngologists were identified to have had COVID‐19, and data for 325 surgeons was available for analysis. The age range was 25 to 84 years, with one‐half under the age of 44 years. There were 24 deaths in the study period, with 83% over age 55 years. Source of infection was likely clinical activity in 175 (54%) cases. Prolonged exposure to a colleague was the source for 37 (11%) surgeons. Six instructional cases were identified where infections occurred during the performance of aerosol‐generating operations (tracheostomy, mastoidectomy, epistaxis control, dacryocystorhinostomy, and translabyrinthine resection). In 3 of these cases, multiple operating room attendees were infected, and in 2, the surgeon succumbed to complications of COVID‐19. Conclusion The etiology of reported cases within the otolaryngology community appear to stem equally from clinical activity and community spread. Multiple procedures performed by otolaryngologists are aerosol‐generating procedures (AGPs) and great care should be taken to protect the surgical team before, during, and after these operations.

Until the 1990s, most therapeutic trials in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) focussed upon endoscopic lesions. In fact the correlation between patient symptoms and both the presence and grade of esophagitis is very poor. The classical criteria for the assessment of therapeutic efficacy in GERD have therefore been revised, and there is now a consensus that the relief of symptoms and the long-term control of the disease are the primary aims of therapy for the majority of patients. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represent the mainstay of therapy for patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) as well as esophagitis. Although a stepwise strategy has been recommended in the past, a step-down strategy (starting with a full-dose PPI) appears to be a more cost-effective approach. There are as yet insufficient data to establish the clear superiority of one PPI over others. PPIs have a number of limitations. Symptom relief is significantly inferior in NERD than in erosive esophagitis. The heterogeneity of the NERD group may be one of the most influential factors, but the role of esophageal hypersensitivity has been suggested especially in patients with normal acid exposure. The role of non-acid reflux should also be scrutinized. Long-term control of the disease can be achieved by drug therapy, anti-reflux surgery and now with a variety of endoscopic procedures. The different drug management strategies can be divided into (i) continuous maintenance therapy and (ii) discontinuous therapy which can again be divided into two categories, intermittent and on-demand drug therapy. A case-by-case approach is recommended to determine the personal therapeutic needs and preferences of each individual. Many patients with NERD or mild esophagitis do not require continuous maintenance therapy and recent studies have shown excellent results with different PPI on-demand therapy regimens. Finally when making a choice between different long-term strategies both the clinician and the informed patient have to consider efficacy, safety, tolerability and cost. The potential efficacy of new drugs, especially the GABA(B) agonists and the fast onset acid suppressors, as well as the cost-effectiveness of non-drug strategies (surgery and endoluminal therapies) should be further evaluated.