Rationale: Chronic electronic cigarette (EC) users exhibit a higher susceptibility of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) to undergo oxidation as compared to non-user controls. However, there is a paucity of data regarding EC effects on lipid peroxidation in the blood and their relationship to cardiovascular risk. Objective: To test the hypothesis that chronic (≥1 year) EC use exerts intermediate effects on plasma lipid peroxidation and/or antioxidant defense compared to chronic tobacco cigarette (TC) smoking. Methods and Results: We enrolled EC-users (n=32), TC-smokers (n=29) and non-users (n=45), with mean ages of 28.3, 27.8 and 27.4 years, respectively. Plasma concentrations of free polyunsaturated fatty acids and oxidized metabolites were assessed by mass spectrometry. Total antioxidant capacity (TAC), concentrations of glutathione, bilirubin, heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and functional activity of paraoxonase1 (PON1) were determined by colorimetric and enzymatic assays. Multivariable analysis was performed using classification models for segregating participants based on biomarker profiles. Plasma arachidonic acid (AA) concentration was higher in TC-smokers but lower in EC-users, together with linoleic acid (LA) concentration, as compared to TC-smokers and non-users (p<0.05). Oxidized LA metabolites (9- and 13-hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (HODE)) were lower in EC-users and TC-smokers as compared to non-users (p<0.001). Consistently, TAC and bilirubin were elevated in EC-users and TC-smokers as compared to non-users (p<0.05). Of interest, plasma HO-1 concentration was higher in TC-smokers as compared to non-users (p=0.01) with intermediate levels in EC-users. Multivariable analysis identified 5 biomarkers (13-HODE, LA, 9-HODE, 12-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (HETE), AA) that discriminated EC-users from TC-smokers and non-users with an accuracy of 73.4%. Conclusions: Chronic use of EC induces common (i.e. lower 9- and/or 13-HODEs and higher TAC and bilirubin) as well as differential effects (i.e. altered AA and LA concentrations) to those induced by TC, along with intermediate plasma HO-1 concentration, suggesting that EC, likewise TC smoke, could impact cardiovascular risk.
Background: Hereditary breast cancer (HBC) comprises more than 10% of all breast cancers (BC). Mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes are found in approximately half of HBC patients. The majority of BRCA1 associated tumors are ER, PR and HER2 negative with basal-like expression pattern. BRCA2 associated tumors are mostly ER positive (ER+). In the present study we aim to further explore clinical and molecular characteristics of BRCA associated BC in 3 different cohorts. Methods: Three different BC databases (DB) were evaluated: (i) Hadassah oncogenetic BC DB (n=4429); (ii) Nick-Zainal et al. BC DB (n=560), and (iii) METABRIC BC DB (n= 1980). We tested for differences in age at diagnosis between BRCA positive (BRCA+) and BRCA negative (BRCA-) patients with either ER+ or ER negative (ER-) tumors. Point mutation analysis was performed in cohorts ii & iii and mRNA differential expression (DEA) and pathway analysis were performed in cohort iii, using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). Results: Age (years) at diagnosis for cohorts i, ii,&iii respectively, for ER+ PT:BRCA1-44, NA, 60; for BRCA2-49, 48, 64; for BN – 53, 56, 63. For ER-: BRCA1-42, 42, 47; for BRCA2-48, 52, 49; for BN-49, 54, 56. For cohorts ii&iii, higher frequencies of TP53 and PIK3Ca mutations were found among BRCA+&BRCA-, respectively. DEA was performed between BRCA+&BRCA- in ER- tumors: the major activated pathways involved cancer related processes and were highly significant (up to p=1e-7.5, FDR=1e-4.5). Surprisingly - the most significant pathway was Estrogen Mediated S-phase Entry and the most activated upstream regulator was ERBB2. Similar evaluation in ER+ showed mostly differences in immune related pathways (differences not statistically significant). Conclusions: Younger age at presentation was observed in BRCA1 vs. BRCA2 patients. No age differences were observed between ER+&ER- PT in cohort i&ii, in cohort iii ER- BRCA+ Patients were younger than ER+ BRCA+ (similar age as ER+ BRCA-). BRCA+ show different mutational profile than BRCA-. ER+ BRCA+ and BRCA- show similar genomic characteristics. By contrast, for ER- BRCA+ differs markedly from BRCA-. This might imply that BRCA+ associated tumors consist of two genomically distinct subtypes: (i) ER-, and (ii) ER+. The results may shed light on possible somatic factors which affect the development of BC BRCA+ and carry preventive and therapeutic implications. Citation Format: Peretz TY, Zick A, Luna K, Grinshpun A, Sonneblick A, Iziely B, Hamburger TG, Cohen S, Granit AM, Dvir M, Rosenberg S. ER dependent breast cancer phenotype in BRCA 1/2 carriers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-02.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.