Background“Health Care Workers in Conflict Areas” emerged as one of the priority themes for a Lancet Commission addressing health in conflict. The objective of our study was to conduct a scoping review on health workers in the setting of the Syrian conflict, addressing four topics of interest: violence against health care workers, education, practicing in conflict setting, and migration.MethodsConsidering the likelihood of scarcity of data, we broadened the scope of the scoping review to include indirect evidence on health care workers from other countries affected by the “Arab Spring”. We electronically searched six electronic databases. We conducted descriptive analysis of the general characteristics of the included papers. We also used the results of this scoping review to build an evidence gap map.ResultsOut of the 11 165 identified citations, 136 met our eligibility criteria. The majority of the articles tackled the issue of violence against health care workers (63%) followed by practicing in conflict setting (19%), migration (17%) and education (10%). Countries in focus of most articles were: Syria (35%), Iraq (33%), and Bahrain (29%). News, editorials, commentaries and opinion pieces made up 81% of all included papers, while primary studies made up only 9%. All the primary studies identified in this review were conducted on Iraq. Most of the articles about violence against health care workers were on Bahrain, followed by Syria and Iraq. The first and corresponding authors were most frequently affiliated with institutions from non-Arab countries (79% and 79% respectively).ConclusionsResearch evidence on health care workers in the setting of the “Arab Spring” is scarce. This review and the gap map can inform the research agendas of funders and researchers working in the field of health care workers in conflict setting. More well-designed primary studies are needed to inform the decisions of policymakers and other interested parties.
WTS is becoming a socially normative behavior among empowered professional women, who can spare the time and expense to engage in this behavior in easily accessible cafés, which prohibit cigarette smoking. Public health implications: Government, media, and NGO campaigns against smoking should target waterpipe use, not only in Lebanon but also across the Arab world and among Arab communities in the Diaspora with messages different from anti-cigarette campaigns.
BackgroundPublic health journals need to have clear policies for reporting the funding of studies and authors’ personal financial and non-financial conflicts of interest (COI) disclosures. This study aims to assess the policies of public health journals on reporting of study funding and the disclosure of authors’ COIs.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study of “Public, Environmental & Occupational Health” journals. Teams of two researchers abstracted data in duplicate and independently using REDCap software.ResultsOf 173 public health journals, 155 (90%) had a policy for reporting study funding information. Out of these, a majority did not require reporting of the phase of the study for which funding was received (88%), nor the types of funding sources (87%). Of the 173 journals, 163 (94%) had a policy requiring disclosure of authors’ COI. However, the majority of these journals did not require financial conflicts of interest disclosures relating to institutions (75%) nor to the author’s family members (90%) while 56% required the disclosure of at least one form of non-financial COI.ConclusionsThe policies of the majority of public health journals do not require the reporting of important details such as the role of the funder, and non-financial COI. Journals and publishers should consider revising their editorial policies to ensure complete and transparent reporting of funding and COI.
Background: Hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 is a rare genetic disorder leading to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Few decades ago, dietary measures and ultimately liver transplant constituted the only treatment modalities. Nowadays, early diagnosis and therapy with nitisinone can reverse the clinical picture. In developing countries, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges may affect the outcome of this disease. The choice of the treatment modality may depend on the economic status of each country. Few reports on the long-term outcome of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 are available from developing and Arab countries.Methods: A retrospective study of charts of Lebanese patients diagnosed with tyrosinemia type 1 and followed, at the American University of Beirut, during a 12-year period was performed. Clinical presentation and liver biochemical profile at diagnosis were analyzed, along with therapeutic modalities and long-term outcome.Results: Twenty-two children were diagnosed and followed during the study period. Median age at diagnosis was 7 months (range: one day to 35 months). Most of the patients presented with hepatomegaly and jaundice. Four patients were referred for atypical presentations with developmental delay and seizures, secondary to undiagnosed hypoglycemia episodes. Around half of the patients presented with failure to thrive. Transaminitis, cholestasis and increased α-fetoprotein level were variably present at diagnosis (36% to 50%). All patients had elevated plasma tyrosine and urinary succinylacetone levels. Genetic testing was performed in 9%. Only one third could be treated with nitisinone. Liver transplant was electively performed in 9% of cases, to overcome the long-term cost of nitisinone. One third of the patients died between the age of 1 month and 11 years. Surviving patients are still candidates for liver transplant.Conclusion: Our experience reflects the challenges of diagnosis and treatment of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 in a developing country. In the absence of specific neonatal screening, early diagnosis relies mostly on the clinical awareness of the physician. Long-term nitisinone use may be deterred by its high cost and liver transplantation carries risks of surgical complications. New, effective, and less expensive treatments are needed, especially for developing countries.
Low percentages of clinical practice guidelines report information on important aspects of authorship and characteristics of individual authors. Better reporting of some of these criteria was associated with journal impact factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.