An Arg present in the third transmembrane domain of all rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptors is required for efficient signal transduction. Mutation of this Arg in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor to Gln, His, or Lys abolished or severely impaired agoniststimulated inositol phosphate generation, consistent with Arg having a role in receptor activation. To investigate the contribution of the surrounding structural domain in the actions of the conserved Arg, an integrated microdomain modeling and mutagenesis approach has been utilized. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) 1 receptor is a member of the rhodopsin-like G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family (1, 2). These heptahelical proteins include the visual opsins and various receptors for neurotransmitters, peptides, and glycoproteins. Activation of these receptors by their diverse agonists is associated with conformational changes in the receptor that facilitate a signal-propagating interaction with G-proteins (3). These conformational changes can involve relative movement of helices, as reported for rhodopsin (4, 5) and/or rotation of the helices as found in a constitutively active adrenergic receptor (6).Sequence alignment of GPCRs shows that certain amino acids are highly conserved at corresponding positions within the putative transmembrane domains (TMD) (7). Transitions among receptor conformations may reflect dynamic changes in side chain interactions within the receptor. Two of these conserved residues have been studied by reciprocal mutation in the GnRH and serotonin receptors, and the results suggest that the TMD 2 and 7 side chains have an interdependent role in receptor activation (8, 9). Most likely several other conserved side chains also interact to form the skeleton required for the conformational rearrangements that accompany the transition between inactive and active receptor states.The elucidation of the intramolecular interactions and conformational changes underlying receptor activation is hindered by the absence of high resolution structural data for any GPCR. The available low resolution projection maps of rhodopsin do not allow inferences about specific side chain interactions (10, 11). A prevalent approach to investigate structure-function relations of GPCRs is to introduce structural perturbations via site-directed mutagenesis and to evaluate their effect on receptor phenotype in binding and signal transduction assays (12). However, determining the phenotype of mutant receptors does not lead to an unequivocal interpretation concerning the structural basis of that phenotype (13).Molecular modeling has facilitated the integration of experimental observations and biophysical data into a mechanistic scheme for receptor structure and function (12,14). Structural and functional details of ligand binding (15,16) and receptor activation by agonist complexing (8,17) and by constitutively activating mutations (18) have been simulated in such models. The receptor models can thus provide a rationalization of current experime...

Transmembrane segment (TMS) 7 has been shown to play an important role in the signal transduction function of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Although transmembrane segments are most likely to adopt a helical structure, results from a variety of experimental studies involving TMS 7 are inconsistent with it being an ideal alpha-helix. Using results from a search of the structure database and extensive simulated annealing Monte Carlo runs with the new Conformational Memories method, we have identified the conserved (N/D)PxxY region of TMS 7 as the major determinant for deviation of TMS 7 from ideal helicity. The perturbation consists of an Asx turn and a flexible "hinge" region. The Conformational Memories procedure yielded a model structure of TMS 7 which, unlike an ideal alpha-helix, is capable of accommodating all of the experimentally derived geometrical criteria for the interactions of TMS 7 in the transmembrane bundle of GPCRs. In the context of the entire structure of a transmembrane bundle model for the 5HT2a receptor, the specific perturbation of TMS 7 by the NP sequence suggests a structural hypothesis for the pattern of amino acid conservation observed in TMS 1, 2, and 7 of GPCRs. The structure resulting from the incorporation of the (N/D)P motif satisfies fully the H-bonding capabilities of the 100% conserved polar residues in these TMSs, in agreement with results from mutagenesis experiments. The flexibility introduced by the specific structural perturbation produced by the (NP/DP) motif in TMS 7 is proposed to have a significant role in receptor activation.

Previous studies have shown that rodent neurofilaments (NF) are obligate heteropolymers requiring NF-L plus either NF-M or NF-H for filament formation. We have assessed the competence of human NF-L and NF-M to assemble and find that unlike rat NF-L, human NF-L is capable of self-assembly. However, human NF-M cannot form homopolymers and requires the presence of NF-L for incorporation into filaments. To investigate the stage at which filament formation is blocked, the rod domains or the full-length subunits of human NF-L, human NF-M, and rodent NF-L were analyzed in the yeast "interaction trap" system. These studies demonstrated that the fundamental block to filament formation in those neurofilaments that do not form homopolymers is at the level of dimer formation. Based on theoretical biophysical considerations of the requirements for the formation of coiled-coil structures, we predicted which amino acid differences were likely to be responsible for the differing dimerization potentials of the rat and human NF-L rod domains. We tested these predictions using site-specific mutagenesis. Interestingly, single amino acid changes in the rod domains designed to restore or eliminate the coiled-coil propensity were found respectively to convert rat NF-L into a subunit capable of homopolymerization and human NF-L into a protein that is no longer able to self-assemble. Our results additionally suggest that the functional properties of the L12 linker region of human NF-L, generally thought to assume an extended ␤-sheet conformation, are consonant with an ␣-helix that positions the heptad repeats before and after it in an orientation that allows coiled-coil dimerization. These studies reveal an important difference between the assembly properties of the human and rodent NF-L subunits possibly suggesting that the initiating events in neurofilament assembly may differ in the two species.Intermediate filaments (IFs) 1 are a heterogeneous family of proteins sharing common structural features that can be subdivided into six types (I-VI) based on sequence homology (1). IF genes are expressed in a cell type-specific and developmentally regulated manner with cells frequently containing only a single IF type at a particular stage of differentiation. Neurofilaments (NFs) are the predominant IF in mature neurons but are preceded during neuronal differentiation by a succession of other IFs including vimentin (2) nestin (49), ␣-internexin (3, 4), and peripherin (5). Neurofilaments are assemblies of three subunits, the NF-L (molecular mass, 68 kDa), NF-M (150 kDa), and NF-H (200 kDa) (6). These three components form heteropolymeric 10-nm filaments that run parallel along the length of the axon with frequent cross-bridges between neighboring filaments. Axonal neurofilaments are thought to serve a primarily structural function. Evidence from a Japanese quail (quiverer) with a spontaneous mutation in NF-L (7) and a line of transgenic mice expressing an NF-H-␤ galactosidase fusion protein (8) suggest that a loss of axonal neurofilaments re...

Mutation of Asp(2.61(98)) at the extracellular boundary of transmembrane helix 2 of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor decreased the affinity for GnRH. Using site-directed mutagenesis, ligand modification, and computational modeling, different side chain interactions of Asp(2.61(98)) that contribute to high-affinity binding were investigated. The conservative Asp(2. 61(98))Glu mutation markedly decreased the affinity for a series of GnRH analogues containing the native His(2) residue. This mutant showed smaller decreases in affinity for His(2)-substituted ligands. The loss of preference for His(2)-containing ligands in the mutant receptor shows that Asp(2.61(98)) determines the specificity for His(2). Analysis of the affinities of a series of position 2-substituted ligands suggests that a hydrogen bond forms between Asp(2.61(98)) and the delta NH group of His(2) and that Asp(2. 61(98)) forms a second hydrogen bond with the ligand. Substitution of Asp(2.61(98)) with an uncharged residue further decreased the affinity for all ligands and also decreased receptor expression. Computational modeling indicates an intramolecular ionic interaction of Asp(2.61(98)) with Lys(3.32(121)) in transmembrane helix 3. The uncharged, Lys(3.32(121))Gln mutation also markedly decreased agonist affinity. The modeling and the similar phenotypes of mutants with uncharged substitutions for Asp(2.61(98)) or Lys(3.32(121)) are consistent with the presence of this helix 2-helix 3 interaction. These studies support a dual role for Asp(2.61(98)): formation of an interhelical interaction with Lys(3.32(121)) that contributes to the structure of the agonist binding pocket and an interaction with His(2) of GnRH that helps stabilize agonist complexing.