Transferred DNA (T‐DNA) insertions of Agrobacterium gene fusion vectors and corresponding insertional target sites were isolated from transgenic and wild type Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Nucleotide sequence comparison of wild type and T‐DNA‐tagged genomic loci showed that T‐DNA integration resulted in target site deletions of 29–73 bp. In those cases where integrated T‐DNA segments turned out to be smaller than canonical ones, the break‐points of target deletions and T‐DNA insertions overlapped and consisted of 5–7 identical nucleotides. Formation of precise junctions at the right T‐DNA border, and DNA sequence homology between the left termini of T‐DNA segments and break‐points of target deletions were observed in those cases where full‐length canonical T‐DNA inserts were very precisely replacing plant target DNA sequences. Aberrant junctions were observed in those transformants where termini of T‐DNA segments showed no homology to break‐points of target sequence deletions. Homology between short segments within target sites and T‐DNA, as well as conversion and duplication of DNA sequences at junctions, suggests that T‐DNA integration results from illegitimate recombination. The data suggest that while the left T‐DNA terminus and both target termini participate in partial pairing and DNA repair, the right T‐DNA terminus plays an essential role in the recognition of the target and in the formation of a primary synapsis during integration.

DNA repair associated with DNA replication is important for the conservation of genomic sequence information, whereas reconstitution of chromatin after replication sustains epigenetic information. We have isolated and characterized mutations in the BRU1 gene of Arabidopsis that suggest a novel link between these underlying maintenance mechanisms. Bru1 plants are highly sensitive to genotoxic stress and show stochastic release of transcriptional gene silencing. They also show increased intrachromosomal homologous recombination and constitutively activated expression of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-2 (AtPARP-2), the induction of which is associated with elevated DNA damage. Bru1 mutations affect the stability of heterochromatin organization but do not interfere with genome-wide DNA methylation. BRU1 encodes a novel nuclear protein with two predicted protein-protein interaction domains. The developmental abnormalities characteristic of bru1 mutant plants resemble those triggered by mutations in genes encoding subunits of chromatin assembly factor (CAF-1), the condensin complex, or MRE11. Comparison of bru1 with these mutants indicates cooperative roles in the replication and stabilization of chromatin structure, providing a novel link between chromatin replication, epigenetic inheritance, S-phase DNA damage checkpoints, and the regulation of meristem development. A dynamic chromatin structure contributes to the regulation of repair and transcription of DNA templates. Chromatin components involved in both processes have been described that imply shared molecular mechanisms modulating DNA accessibility for repair and transcription (Green and Almouzni 2002). The first molecular link between transcription and DNA repair was revealed during characterization of transcription factor IIH (TFIIH), which is required for initiation of RNA synthesis by RNA polymerase II and for efficient repair of DNA through nucleotide excision (Feaver et al. 1993;Schaeffer et al. 1993;Drapkin et al. 1994;Wang et al. 1994).Accessibility is determined by compaction of chromatin, which consists of loosely packaged, transcriptionally active euchromatin, and heterochromatin, which is condensed and transcriptionally silent and consists mainly of transposable elements and repetitive sequences. Chromatin states are inherited during DNA replication, providing a scaffold for epigenetic information that influences transcriptional gene regulation.Several chromatin components determining heritable features of chromatin also have an influence on epigenetic regulation of gene activity and efficiency of DNA repair or genome stability. For example, SIR proteins in yeast mediate formation of a compact chromatin structure similar to heterochromatin in multicellular eukaryotes (Gross 2001) and are required for transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) and for suppression of homologous recombination of rDNA repeats (Guarente 2000). They

Plants, in contrast to other eukaryotes, possess not only homologs of subunit A (AtSPO11-1, 2, 3) but also of subunit B (AtTOP6B) of the archaebacterial topoisomerase VI. AtTOP6B and AtSPO11-3 are strongly expressed in somatic tissue of Arabidopsis and are able to interact with each other in vitro. A T-DNA insertion in AtTOP6B results in deficient cell proliferation; plants stop growing at the rosette stage, have small crinkled leaves, and die about 4 weeks after germination. Cultured root cells die after a limited number of cell divisions. The mitotic index of the root meristems is strongly reduced. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrates that endoreplication in mutant plants is stopped at the 8C stage; the last cycle is not completed in most cases. Mutant plants show a significant increase in nuclear DNA strand breaks. A T-DNA insertion mutant of AtSPO11-3 has a phenotype that is almost to that of AtTOP6B and the double mutant. Thus, both genes seem to act in vivo as subunits of a functional entity. A loss of this function most likely results in a defect in DNA replication, leading directly, or via the activation of a DNA damage checkpoint, to an arrest of cell division and endoreduplication. The dependence on an archaebacterial topoisomerase VI homolog distinguishes plants from the other eukaryotic kingdoms.

The three protocols of the comet assay A/N, A/A and N/N were for the first time applied to the plant species Arabidopsis thaliana. The purpose of the experiments was to establish conditions for genotoxic exposure causing DNA damage in Arabidopsis nuclei. This is required for comprehensive gene expression profiling with the intention to screen for genes involved in response of Arabidopsis cells to genotoxic stress.Five chemicals belonging to different classes of mutagens (the monofunctional alkylating agents N-methyl-N-nitrosourea and methyl methanesulfonate, the polyfunctional alkylating agent mitomycin C, the radiomimetic bleomycin and the herbicide maleic hydrazide) were tested. Except for maleic hydrazide, dose-dependent increases in DNA damage were found using the A/N comet assay protocol. While a rapid repair of bleomycin-mediated SSBs and DSBs was found, no significant reduction of DNA migration was observed up to 48 h after treatment with the monofunctional alkylating agents.

Amifostine protects normal cells from DNA damage induction by ionizing radiation or chemotherapeutics, whereas cancer cells typically remain uninfluenced. While confirming this phenomenon, we have revealed by comet assay and currently the most sensitive method of DNA double strand break (DSB) quantification (based on γH2AX/53BP1 high-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy) that amifostine treatment supports DSB repair in γ-irradiated normal NHDF fibroblasts but alters it in MCF7 carcinoma cells. These effects follow from the significantly lower activity of alkaline phosphatase measured in MCF7 cells and their supernatants as compared with NHDF fibroblasts. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry confirmed that the amifostine conversion to WR-1065 was significantly more intensive in normal NHDF cells than in tumor MCF cells. In conclusion, due to common differences between normal and cancer cells in their abilities to convert amifostine to its active metabolite WR-1065, amifostine may not only protect in multiple ways normal cells from radiation-induced DNA damage but also make cancer cells suffer from DSB repair alteration.