No abstract

Food-borne salmonellosis continues to be a major public health concern, and contamination with Salmonella spp. in pre-harvest animal production is considered a primary contributor to this problem. Animal feeds can easily become contaminated during primary production, feed mixing and processing as well as during feeding. Consequently, monitoring and surveillance of feeds and feed ingredients for Salmonella spp. contamination may be useful or necessary in the prevention and control of this organism. Cultural and immunological detection methods for salmonellae have been used or suggested as possible approaches for use in animal feeds. Cultural methods remain advantageous owing to their ability to detect viable bacterial cells, while immunological methods have the capability of detecting nonculturable bacterial cells. Advancements and improvements in both methodologies offer opportunities for eventual routine use of these detection technologies in animal feed assays.

Salmonellosis is a cyclic problem in the food industry, to which animal feed has been contributory. Current conventional methods of Salmonella spp. detection require 96 h for detection and confirmation. With modern and just‐in‐time production schedules, a 96‐h hold represents a significant expense in storage and decontamination. The commercially available assay, ‘BAX™ for Screening/Salmonella’ (BAX), is based on the principle of the polymerase chain reaction and may represent a significant decrease in assay time. Seven fresh feed formulations, two fresh feed ingredients, seven stored feeds and two stored feed ingredients were artificially contaminated with a primary poultry isolate of Salmonella typhimurium and analysed by conventional and BAX methodology. The results of BAX agreed with conventional plating results for 16 of 18 samples spiked with 1200 cfu 10 g−1 of feed and 13 of 18 samples spiked with 40 cfu 10 g−1 of feed. Indigenous Salmonella spp. were detected in five of eight samples of poultry diets by conventional methods. With BAX, Salmonella spp. could not be detected in any of the samples after only 7 h of enrichment but could be detected in two dietary samples after 13 h of enrichment and four dietary samples after 24 h of enrichment. Specific sequences of salmonella DNA that were extracted from poultry diets could be detected with BAX.

No abstract