[1] We present a comparison between a simple but general model of solar windmagnetosphere-ionosphere coupling (the Hill model) and the output of a global magnetospheric MHD code, the Integrated Space Weather Prediction Model (ISM). The Hill model predicts transpolar potential and region 1 currents from environmental conditions specified at both boundaries of the magnetosphere: at the solar wind boundary, electric field strength, ram pressure, and interplanetary magnetic field direction; at the ionospheric boundary, conductance and dipole strength. As its defining feature, the Hill model predicts saturation of the transpolar potential for high electric field intensities in the solar wind, which accords with observations. The model predicts how saturation depends on boundary conditions. We compare the output from ISM runs against these predictions. The agreement is quite good for non-storm conditions (differences less than 10%) and still good for storm conditions (differences up to 20%). The comparison demonstrates that global MHD codes (like ISM) can also exhibit saturation of transpolar potential for high electric field intensities in the solar wind. We use both models to explore how the strength of solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling depends on the strength of Earth's magnetic dipole, which varies on short geological timescales. As measured by power into the ionosphere, these models suggest that magnetic storms might be considerably more active for high dipole strengths. [2] Total region 1 current, I 1 , and transpolar potential, È pc , epitomize solar wind-magnetosphere-ionosphere (SW-M-I) coupling. Progress in understanding this subject can almost be measured by how well the field predicts these quantities. (Region 2 currents, which this paper does not treat, are also an important aspect of the story. In section 7 we discuss how they might affect results presented here.) First models of SW-M-I coupling, reviewed by Reiff and Luhmann [1986], assumed one-way coupling from the solar wind to the ionosphere in which magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause taps a fraction of the solar wind potential across the magnetosphere, È sw , to yield an available magnetospheric convection potential È m . È m is then impressed via equipotential magnetic field lines onto the ionosphere, where it becomes the È pc that generates region 1 currents. The envisioned process was therefore linear. Empirical formulas based on this linear assumption work fairly well, except they tend to overpredict È pc for big values of È sw . This tendency has been called saturation of the transpolar potential at high values [Reiff and Luhmann, 1986;Russell et al., 2000].[3] Hill et al. [1976] presented a model of SW-M-I coupling that manifests saturation intrinsically and at about the observed value. (Hill [1984] developed the implications of the model further. We therefore refer to it as the Hill model.) Saturation is a nonlinear process that, in the Hill model, results from a feedback in which the magnetic field generated by region 1 cu...
[1] MHD simulations give about the same dependence of transpolar potential on solar wind electric field (IEF) as the Hill model of transpolar potential, including saturation and dependence on ram pressure. In the Hill model, feedback of the region 1 current system is presumed to limit the rate of reconnection at the magnetopause thereby causing transpolar potential saturation. MHD simulations add as relevant information that in the saturation domain the region 1 current system usurps the role of the Chapman-Ferraro current system, which disappears. This means that the region 1 current system takes on the role of providing the current and generating most of the magnetic field in the J Â B force at the magnetopause that balances solar wind ram pressure. Viewed from this perspective, transpolar potential saturation results not from the region 1 current system limiting the rate of reconnection at the magnetopause but instead from ram pressure (more accurately, total solar wind stresses) limiting the total amount of current that can flow in the region 1 current system. Transpolar potential saturation is then the limit on transpolar potential that corresponds to the ram-pressure limit on total region 1 current.
Abstract. We use a global MHD simulation to compute the distribution of E,, on the face of the magnetopause as represented by the last closed field line surface. In MHD codes, E,, is a proxy for magnetic reconnection. Integrating E,, along the topological separator line between open and closed magnetic field lines gives the global reconnection rate at the magnetopause. In the case studied here, where the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) is precisely duskward, we find the global reconnection rate to be ~49 kV, comparable to potentials inferred from measurements made in the polar cap. The exercise demonstrates an application of a general reconnection theorem that, in effect, equates reconnection with E,,. It prepares the way for MHD imaging of reconnection in terms of contours of E,, on the magnetopause. The result also illustrates a property of parallel potentials in the global context that is not generally recognized. Nearly the full magnetopause reconnection voltage exists on some closed field lines between the northern and southern polar caps, so that they leave the dawn, southern hemisphere with a sizable positive polarity and enter the dusk, northern hemisphere with a sizable negative polarity. An unexpected finding is a substantial parallel potential (between 10 and 15 kV) between the magnetopause and the ionosphere in northern dawn and southern dusk sectors. (Interchange "dawn" and "dusk" for dawnward IMF.) This potential has the polarity that accelerates electrons into the ionosphere in the dusk sector and, so, might be the origin of the "hot spot" seen there in precipitating electrons. Magnetic Reconnection at the
Abstract. As revealed in MHD simulation, the magnetospheric sash is a band of weak magnetic field that, for the usual case in which the IMF is approximately perpendicular to thi geomagnetic dipole, runs tailward along the highlatitude magnetopause flanks from one dayside cusp to the other, closing via the cross-tail neutral sheet. On the magnetopause flanks, it contains the magnetic separator line, at which all three topological types of field lines meet. Seen in a cross-sectional plane through the near-Earth tail, the magnetospheric sash takes the form of the cross-tail S, a weak-field feature comprised of the tail neutral sheet with diagonally symmetric extensions along the magnetopause flanks connecting it to the separator line. The cross-tail S is evident in the MHD results and in cross-sectional maps based on IMP 8 data. The magnetopause expression of the sash is latent in prior works that described the geometry of antiparallel fields across the magnetopause and the consequent cancellation of the fields within the magnetopause layer. The sash picture bears a strong resemblance to antiparallel merging geometry. A new global magnetospheric structureGlobal MHD simulation reveals a hitherto unrecognized global magnetospheric structure. It is perhaps best described as a low field strength feature that runs, ribbon like, from one dayside cusp tailward along one flank of the magnetopause, then through the near-Earth tail as the neutral sheet to the other magnetopause flank, along which it runs back to the other dayside cusp. In keeping with the tradition of using sartorial designations for magnetospheric plasma structures--e.g., hood, mantle, sheet, and belt--we propose calling this newly recognized ribbon-like feature the magnetospheric sash. Our purpose here is to use a particular MHD simulation to document the sash's geometry, to ground its existence in global magnetic topology, and to identify its presence in data and its adumbration in prior work. The ISM MHD codeBefore describing the sash, we give some details of the MHD code and the boundary and initial conditions of the simulation to be presented here.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.