Sleep disorders are highly prevalent in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and can significantly impair cognitive rehabilitation. No proven therapies exist to mitigate the neurocognitive consequences of TBI. We show that mild brain injury in mice causes a persistent inability to maintain wakefulness and decreases orexin neuron activation during wakefulness. We gave mice a dietary supplement of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), precursors for de novo glutamate synthesis in the brain. BCAA therapy reinstated activation of orexin neurons and improved wake deficits in mice with mild brain injury. Our data suggest that dietary BCAA intervention, acting in part through orexin, can ameliorate injury-induced sleep disturbances and may facilitate cognitive rehabilitation after brain injury.

PurposeTo review brachytherapy use in recurrent head and neck carcinoma (RHNC) with focus on its efficacy and complication rates.Material and methodsA literature search of PubMed, Ovid, Google Scholar, and Scopus was conducted from 1990 to 2017. Publications describing treatment of RHNC with brachytherapy with or without surgery were included. The focus of this review is on oncologic outcomes and the safety of brachytherapy in the recurrent setting.ResultsThirty studies involving RHNC treatment with brachytherapy were reviewed. Brachytherapy as adjunctive treatment to surgical resection appears to be associated with an improved local regional control and overall survival, when compared with the published rates for re-irradiation utilizing external beam radiotherapy (RT) or brachytherapy alone. Safety data remains variable with different isotopes and dose rates with implantable brachytherapy demonstrating a tolerable side effect profile.ConclusionsAlthough surgery remains a mainstay treatment for RHNC, intraoperative interstitial brachytherapy delivery as adjunctive therapy may improve the treatment outcome and may be associated with fewer complication rates as compared to reirradiation using external beam radiotherapy. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role of brachytherapy for RHNC.

Objective(s): Upper airway stimulator (UAS) placement is a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with few complications and low morbidity. UAS placement has traditionally been performed using a three-incision approach, however, it has been implanted using a two-incision approach. This approach could significantly decrease operation time without a difference in postoperative complications, demonstrating its safety and feasibility for UAS placement. The objective was to assess operative time and complication rate in the two-incision approach for UAS placement compared to the three-incision approach.Study Design: Retrospectively reviewed. Methods: Patients who underwent UAS placement using the two-or three-incision approach at a single academic institution from November 2014 to June 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The two-incision approach did not include the incision at the mid-axillary line. Main outcome measures included operation time and complication rates.Results: Three-hundred forty-eight patients underwent UAS placement. The three-incision approach demonstrated an average operation time of 143.3 minutes whereas the two-incision approach averaged 129.4 minutes (P < .001). There was no significant difference in rate of postoperative complications between the two-and three-incision cohorts including pneumothorax (0% vs. 0.4%, P > .99), patient-reported discomfort (5.6% vs. 6.5%, P > .99), activity restriction (0% vs. 1.4%, P > .50), and incisional pain (0.0% vs. 1.0%, P > .99). No patients experienced incision site bleeding or infection. The two-incision approach was associated with decreased rate of revision surgery (0.0% vs. 5.4%, P = .048). Conclusion:The UAS two-incision approach proved to have a significantly shorter operative time without an increase in complications as compared to the three-incision approach. This approach is a safe and feasible option.

No abstract