Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is of great concern and is a threat to human health. In this study, we investigate the mechanisms of colistin resistance in four isogenic pairs of A. baumannii isolates displaying an increase in colistin MICs. A mutation in pmrB was detected in each colistin-resistant isolate, three of which were novel (A28V, I232T, and ΔL9-G12). Increased expression of pmrC was shown by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) for three colistin-resistant isolates, and the addition of phosphoethanolamine (PEtN) to lipid A by PmrC was revealed by mass spectrometry. Interestingly, PEtN addition was also observed in some colistin-susceptible isolates, indicating that this resistance mechanism might be strain specific and that other factors could contribute to colistin resistance. Furthermore, the introduction of pmrAB carrying the short amino acid deletion ΔL9-G12 into a pmrAB knockout strain resulted in increased pmrC expression and lipid A modification, but colistin MICs remained unchanged, further supporting the strain specificity of this colistin resistance mechanism. Of note, a mutation in the pmrC homologue eptA and a point mutation in ISAba1 upstream of eptA were associated with colistin resistance and increased eptA expression, which is a hitherto undescribed resistance mechanism. Moreover, no cost of fitness was observed for colistin-resistant isolates, while the virulence of these isolates was increased in a Galleria mellonella infection model. Although the mutations in pmrB were associated with colistin resistance, PEtN addition appears not to be the sole factor leading to colistin resistance, indicating that the mechanism of colistin resistance is far more complex than previously suspected and is potentially strain specific.
Background
Timely availability of microbiological results from positive blood cultures is essential to enable early pathogen-directed therapy. The Accelerate Pheno system (ADX) is a novel technology using fluorescence in situ hybridization for rapid species identification (ID) and morphokinetic bacterial analysis for phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), with promising results. Yet the impact of this technology on clinical management and patient outcome remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted a quasiexperimental before-and-after observational study and analyzed 3 groups with different diagnostic and therapeutic pathways following recent integration of ADX: conventional microbiological diagnostics with and without antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) intervention, and rapid diagnostics (ADX in addition to conventional standard) with ASP intervention. Primary endpoints were time to adequate, to optimal and to step-down antimicrobial therapy. Secondary endpoints were antimicrobial consumption, in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and the incidence of Clostridioidesdifficile infection (CDI).
Results
Two hundred four patients (conventional diagnostics, n = 64; conventional diagnostics + ASP, n = 68; rapid diagnostics + ASP; n = 72) were evaluated. The use of ADX significantly decreased time from Gram stain to ID (median, 23 vs 2.2 hours, P < .001) and AST (median, 23 vs 7.4 hours, P < .001), from Gram stain to optimal therapy (median, 11 vs 7 hours, P = .024) and to step-down antimicrobial therapy (median, 27.8 vs 12 hours, P = .019). However, groups did not differ in antimicrobial consumption, duration of antimicrobial therapy, mortality, LOS, or incidence of CDI.
Conclusions
Use of ADX significantly reduced time to ID and AST as well as time to optimal antimicrobial therapy but did not affect antimicrobial consumption and clinical outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.