No abstract

Background:The arctic front cryoballoon (AF-CB) provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging clinical outcome. The POLARx cryoballoon incorporates unique features and design changes that may translate into improved efficacy, safety and further simplified balloon-based procedures. Efficacy and safety of the novel POLARx cryoballoon was compared to the fourth generation AF-CB (AF-CB4).Methods and Results: Twenty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were prospectively enrolled, underwent POLARx-based PVI (POLARx group) and were compared to 25 consecutive patients treated with the AF-CB4 (AF-CB4 group). All PVs were successfully isolated utilizing the POLARx and AF-CB4. A significant difference regarding the mean minimal cryoballoon temperatures reached using the AF-CB4 and POLARx (−50±6°C vs. −57±7°C, P=0.004) was observed. Real-time PVI was visualized in 81% of POLARx patients and 42% of AF-CB4 patients (P<0.001). Utilizing the POLARx, a trend towards shorter median procedure time (POLARx: 45 [39, 53] min vs. AF-CB4: 55 [50, 60] min; P=0.062) was found. No differences were observed between AF-CB4 and POLARx concerning catheter maneuverability, catheter stability and periprocedural complications. Conclusions:The novel POLARx showed similar safety and efficacy compared to the AF-CB4. A higher rate of real-time PV recordings and significantly lower minimal balloon temperatures were observed using the POLARx.

Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment provides effective and durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and is associated with encouraging clinical outcome. A novel CF sensing temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) ablation catheter allows for very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD, 90 W/4 s) ablation aiming a potentially safer, more effective and faster ablation. We thought to evaluate preliminary safety and efficacy of vHP-SD ablation for PVI utilizing a novel vHP-SD catheter. The data was compared to conventional power-controlled ablation index (AI) guided PVI utilizing conventional contact force (CF) sensing catheters. Methods and Results Fifty-six patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF were prospectively enrolled in this study. Twenty-eight consecutive patients underwent vHP-SD based PVI (vHP-SD group) and were compared to 28 consecutive patients treated with conventional CF-sensing catheters utilizing the AI (control group). All PVs were successfully isolated using vHP-SD. The median RF ablation time for vHP-SD was 338 (IQR 286, 367) seconds vs control 1580 (IQR 1350, 1848) seconds (p < 0.0001), the median procedure duration was vHP-SD 55 (IQR 48–60) minutes vs. control 105 (IQR 92–120) minutes (p < 0.0001). No differences in periprocedural complications were observed. Conclusions This preliminary data of the novel vHP-SD ablation mode provides safe and effective PVI. Procedure duration and RF ablation time were substantially shorter in the vHP-SD group in comparison to the control group.

Aims Weight management seems to be beneficial for obese atrial fibrillation (AF) patients; however, randomized data are sparse. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of weight reduction on AF ablation outcomes. Methods and results SORT-AF is an investigator-sponsored, prospective, randomized, multicentre, and clinical trial. Patients with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal or persistent) and body mass index (BMI) 30–40 kg/m2 underwent AF ablation and were randomized to either weight-reduction (group 1) or usual care (group 2), after sleep–apnoea–screening and loop recorder (ILR) implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as AF burden between 3 and 12 months after AF ablation. Overall, 133 patients (60 ± 10 years, 57% persistent AF) were randomized to group 1 (n = 67) and group 2 (n = 66), respectively. Complications after AF-ablation were rare (one stroke and no tamponade). The intervention led to a significant reduction of BMI (34.9 ± 2.6–33.4 ± 3.6) in group 1 compared to a stable BMI in group 2 (P &lt; 0.001). Atrial fibrillation burden after ablation decreased significantly (P &lt; 0.001), with no significant difference regarding the primary endpoint between the groups (P = 0.815, odds ratio: 1.143, confidence interval: 0.369–3.613). Further analyses showed a significant correlation between BMI and AF recurrence for patients with persistent AF compared with paroxysmal AF patients (P = 0.032). Conclusion The SORT-AF study shows that AF ablation is safe and successful in obese patients using continuous monitoring via ILR. Although the primary endpoint of AF burden after ablation did not differ between the two groups, the effects of weight loss and improvement of exercise activity were beneficial for obese patients with persistent AF demonstrating the relevance of life-style management as an important adjunct to AF ablation in this setting. Trial registration number NCT02064114.