The authors evaluated the utility of 3 decision support tools for assessing acute risk of violence in patients undergoing behavioral emergencies that warranted hospitalization. Information available at the time of admission to a short-term psychiatric unit was coded from the medical charts of 100 patients using the Historical, Clinical, Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Screening Version (PCL-SV), and the McNiel-Binder Violence Screening Checklist (VSC). Nurses rated violence that later occurred during hospitalization with the Overt Aggression Scale. Scores on all 3 instruments were associated with the likelihood of violence. The strongest predictive relationships were obtained for indices of clinical risk factors rather than historical risk factors. The results suggest that decision support tools, particularly those that emphasize clinical risk factors, have the potential to improve decision making about violence risk in the context of behavioral emergencies.
The findings suggest that injuries to staff members on a unit treating both men and women are as likely to be caused by violence by female patients as by male patients. When a female patient exhibits signs of an elevated risk of violence, the significance of that risk should not be discounted on the basis of her gender.
This study investigated the relationship of protective factors (PF) to adult adaptation in a nonclinical sample consisting of 264 undergraduate women: two groups without childhood sexual abuse (CSA), high (n = 109) and low (n = 99) on PF; and two groups with CSA, high (n = 17) and low (n = 27) on PF. The first hypothesis that higher levels of PF would be significantly associated with higher levels of functioning for all individuals was supported by the data. The second hypothesis that the women with CSA and higher levels of PF would appear similar in adaptation to those without CSA was also supported. The findings further suggest that though the protective factors were beneficial for most individuals, they were significantly more helpful for those with CSA.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.