The phase equilibria of binary CO 2 + n-alkane mixtures have been studied by an important number of authors, both experimentally and using different types of thermodynamic models. Modeling studies of the phase behavior of such highly nonideal systems have generally achieved only partially accurate results in the correlation of phase equilibrium data when considering wide ranges of temperature, pressure, and n-alkane molecular weight. In this study, a predictive correlation for the phase behavior of CO 2 + n-alkane systems, based on a three-parameter cubic equation of state (EOS), that is, the RK-PR EOS, coupled to cubic mixing rules (CMRs), is developed and tested. CMRs have been shown to be capable of an accurate correlation of the phase equilibria asymmetric CO 2 + n-alkane binary systems, in wide ranges of temperature and pressure, when using system-specific interaction parameters. For developing the predictive correlation a critical review of published experimental data for the series was carried out, covering a total of about 100 references. An important degree of inaccuracy or scatter is often found when comparing data sets from different laboratories, specially for the more asymmetric systems (CO 2 + a long chain n-alkane). Tables of references covering CO 2 + n-alkane systems from C1 to C36 are presented for different types of experimental data, including critical end points (CEPs), critical points, liquid−liquid−vapor (LLV) equilibrium, and isobaric (Txy), isothermal (Pxy), and isoplethic (PT) two-phase equilibrium data sets. Examples of disagreement between different sets of data are presented and discussed. In some cases, a decision concerning the identification of the set that should be regarded as the most reliable, can be based on the experimental method employed, on the purity of the n-alkane, and on the observation of other data for conditions, and/or systems in the series, which are close to those of the data set under scrutiny. Nevertheless, the availability of such information is not enough, in other cases, to assess the quality of a given data set, where we have either different data sets in disagreement or a unique set, for which we are in doubt about its accuracy. In such situation, a predictive correlation for the whole series of binary systems is helpful to make a decision on the possible level of reliability of a given phase equilibrium data set. The present study is useful both to make decisions on conflicts between contradictory phase equilibrium data sets and to predict the phase equilibria of binary systems that have no experimental information available in the literature.
