Introduction: the multifactorial nature of motor development is reinforced by the combination of biological and environmental risk factors, which intensify the chances of impaired motor development. Objectives: to verify the relationship between functional mobility skills of children with risk factors and motor stimulus opportunities in their home environment. Methods: transversal study conducted with 112 patients aged 18-42 months from follow-up services. Motor stimulus opportunities were evaluated by the Affordance in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD-SR) and Functional mobility skills by the Pediatric Evaluation Disability Inventory (PEDI). Student t test and multiple linear regression analysis were carried out. Results: predominance of good performance of functional mobility skills and "average level" of environmental stimulus opportunities were observed. There was no significant association between HFM-PEDI and AHEMD-SR. The results showed significant association only between HFM-PEDI and presence of health problems (p = 0.004). Children with health problems had lower mean PEDI normative score. Multiple linear regression analysis showed significant result for health problems in the interaction among environment, control variables and HFM-PEDI (p = 0.003). Conclusion: there was no association between functional mobility skills of children with risk factors and motor stimulus opportunities in their home environment. On the other hand, children with some health problem showed lower performance in functional mobility skills.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar o desempenho funcional de crianças em idade pré-escolar nascidas com diferentes graus de prematuridade e baixo peso, acompanhados em serviço de follow-up. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal, que utilizou o instrumento Inventário de Avaliação Pediátrica de Incapacidade - PEDI, uma entrevista estruturada para cuidadores de crianças que avalia as habilidades funcionais e o nível de independência nas áreas de autocuidado, mobilidade e função social. O teste foi realizado com 98 participantes divididos em três grupos, em um momento de acordo com o grau de prematuridade e em outro de acordo com o peso ao nascer. Utilizou-se o teste qui-quadrado e a análise de variância para verificar a associação e diferença entre os grupos com diferentes graus de prematuridade e baixo peso ao nascer e o PEDI. Em todas as análises considerou-se o nível de significância de α = 0,05. RESULTADOS: Houve atraso nas habilidades funcionais de autocuidado (HFAC), de mobilidade (HFM), e de função social (HFFS) de 10,2%, 12,2% e 14,3%, respectivamente, e no nível de assistência recebida do cuidador de 11,2% em autocuidado (ACAC), 19,4% em mobilidade (ACM) e 15,3% em função social (ACFS). Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre os grupos de diferentes graus de prematuridade e baixo peso ao nascer em relação a nenhum dos domínios do PEDI. CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS: Crianças prematuras e com baixo peso ao nascer apresentaram alterações na idade pré-escolar do desempenho funcional nas áreas autocuidado, mobilidade e função social que não variaram em magnitude entre os diferentes graus de prematuridade e peso ao nascimento.
Introduction: Child development is the result of the interaction between biological and environmental factors. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the Functional Capacity, Independence and Home Affordances Level of Stimulation of premature children between 18 and 42 months, attending or not daycare centers. Methods: Cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 26 premature children between 18 and 42 months, paired and divided into two groups: attending (study group) and not attending daycare centers (control group). Data was collected from the questionnaires AHEMD-SR, PEDI and an identi ication questionnaire. Data analysis was performed by descriptive statistics, and Chi-square, Fisher, Mann-Whitney and Univariate Analysis tests, considering the level of signi icance of α = 0.05 and tendency of differentiation when α < 010. Results: There was a signi icant difference in the AHEMD-SR`s Variety of Stimulation (p = 0.036), higher in the control group, and tendency in the Gross Motor Toys (p = 0.086), more available in the study group. In PEDI, there was signi icant difference in Self-care (p = 0.045) and tendency of differentiation in Mobility (0.068), both of the Caregiver Assistance part (greater to the study). The sample showed low stimulation opportunities regarding Fine and Gross Motor Toys and high percentages of delay in Functional Skills (Mobility) and Independence (Self Care and Mobility), especially in the control group. Conclusion: Daycare centers seem to positively affect the Functional Capacity and Independence in premature children between 18 and 42 months.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.