As many as third of the women perceive their childbirth as traumatic and although prevalence rates vary between studies, around 2–5% of women in community samples may develop childbirth-related postpartum post-traumatic stress disorder (PPTSD). The City Birth Trauma Scale (BiTS) was developed to address the need for a DSM-5-based instrument that assesses PPTSD. The BiTS is a self-report questionnaire, which covers all DSM-5 PTSD criteria, including the four symptom clusters – re-experiencing, avoidance, negative mood and cognitions and hyperarousal symptoms. The present study aimed to describe the psychometric properties and validate the Hebrew version of the BiTS. Five hundred and four mothers of 0- to 12-month-old infants were sampled using social media and the snowball method. Respondents completed an online survey consisting of a demographic questionnaire and the Hebrew versions of the BiTS, the impact of event scale-revised (IES-R), the Edinburgh postpartum depression scale (EPDS), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The Hebrew BiTS demonstrated high internal consistency for the total scale (Cronbach α = 0.90) and good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.75–0.85) for the subscales. An exploratory factor (EFA) analysis yielded a two-factors solution, accounting for 45% of variance, with general symptoms loaded on Factor 1, and childbirth-related symptoms loaded on Factor 2, with both factors demonstrating high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.90, 0.85, respectively). High convergent validity for the symptom cluster subscales was demonstrated with the parallel IES-R subscales, EPDS and PSQI. A two-step cluster analysis indicated that dysphoric and hyperarousal symptoms best differentiated the severity of symptoms of respondents across measures. In sum, the Hebrew BiTS was psychometrically sound, indicating its utility for clinical and non-clinical research. The EFA and cluster analyses support the differentiation between symptoms of dysphoria and hyperarousal from trauma (i.e., childbirth) specific symptoms, suggesting that symptoms relating to specific aspects of the trauma differ qualitatively from general symptom in the phenomenology of PPTSD. Further research using clinical samples and comparing the BiTS to DSM-5 diagnosis using clinical interview is needed.

The difference between FOC levels pre- and post-partum was associated with personality variables and birth outcomes resulting in a model describing the variance in FOC post-partum by all of the above mentioned variables. As the implications of FOC over delivery outcomes are evident, women suffering from FOC pre-partum should be screened routinely before delivery and offered proper care.

BackgroundAlthough the impact of emergency procedures on the childbirth experience has been studied extensively, a possible association of childbirth experience with indications for emergency interventions has not been reported.ObjectivesTo compare the impacts on childbirth experience of ‘planned’ delivery (elective cesarean section and vaginal delivery) versus ‘unplanned’ delivery (vacuum extraction or emergency cesarean section); the intervention itself (vacuum extraction versus emergency cesarean section); and indications for intervention (arrest of labor versus risk to the mother or fetus).Study designA total of 469 women, up to 72 hours post-partum, in the maternity ward of one tertiary health care institute completed the Subjective Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (score: 0–4, a higher score indicated a more negative experience) and a Personal Information Questionnaire. Intra-partum information was retrieved from the medical records. One-way analysis of variance and two-way analysis of variance, followed by analysis of covariance, to test the unique contribution of variables, were used to examine differences between groups in outcome. Tukey's Post-Hoc analysis was used when appropriate.ResultsPlanned delivery, either vaginal or elective cesarean section, was associated with a more positive experience than unplanned delivery, either vacuum or emergency cesarean section (mean respective Subjective Childbirth Experience scores: 1.58 and 1.49 vs. 2.02 and 2.07, P <0.01). The difference in mean Subjective Childbirth Experience scores following elective cesarean section and vaginal delivery was not significant; nor was the difference following vacuum extraction and emergency cesarean section. Interventions due to immediate risk to mother or fetus resulted in a more positive birth experience than interventions due to arrest of labor (Subjective Childbirth Experience: 1.9 vs. 2.2, P <0.01).ConclusionsCompared to planned interventions, unplanned interventions were shown to be associated with a more negative maternal childbirth experience. However, the indication for unplanned intervention appears to have a greater effect than the nature of the intervention on the birth experience. Women who underwent emergency interventions due to delay of birth (arrest of labor) perceived their birth experience more negatively than those who underwent interventions due to risk for the mother or fetus, regardless of the nature of the intervention (vacuum or emergency cesarean section). The results indicate the importance of follow-up after unexpected emergency interventions, especially following arrest of labor, as negative birth experience may have repercussions in a woman's psychosocial life and well-being.

The only psychological variable associated with the choice for cesarean section on maternal request was the fear of childbirth.

The paper presents an application of a new Rorschach index, the Reality-Fantasy Scale (RFS)