Patients with late‐stage Kellgren‐Lawrence knee osteoarthritis received a single intra‐articular injection of 1, 10, or 50 million bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (BM‐MSCs) in a phase I/IIa trial to assess safety and efficacy using a broad toolset of analytical methods. Besides safety, outcomes included patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs): Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cartilage morphology (Whole Organ MRI Scores [WORMS]), collagen content (T2 scores), and synovitis; and inflammation and cartilage turnover biomarkers, all over 12 months. BM‐MSCs were characterized by a panel of anti‐inflammatory markers to predict clinical efficacy. There were no serious adverse events, although four patients had minor, transient adverse events. There were significant overall improvements in KOOS pain, symptoms, quality of life, and WOMAC stiffness relative to baseline; the 50 million dose achieved clinically relevant improvements across most PROMs. WORMS and T2 scores did not change relative to baseline. However, cartilage catabolic biomarkers and MRI synovitis were significantly lower at higher doses. Pro‐inflammatory monocytes/macrophages and interleukin 12 levels decreased in the synovial fluid after MSC injection. The panel of BM‐MSC anti‐inflammatory markers was strongly predictive of PROMs over 12 months. Autologous BM‐MSCs are safe and result in significant improvements in PROMs at 12 months. Our analytical tools provide important insights into BM‐MSC dosing and BM‐MSC reduction of synovial inflammation and cartilage degradation and provide a highly predictive donor selection criterion that will be critical in translating MSC therapy for osteoarthritis. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2019;8:746&757

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) is the fifth leading cause of death in men globally. Measurement of the blood PSA level is still considered the gold-standard biomarker test for PC despite its high rate of delivering false positives and negatives that result in an inappropriate medical response, including overtreatment. We collected extracellular vesicles (EVs) from the blood plasma of PC patients with organ-confined, extracapsular-invading, and seminal vesicle–invading tumors and from healthy subjects. We examined the protein, mRNA, and miRNA content of these EVs using mass spectrometry (MS), a human PC PCR array, and a miScript miRNA PCR array, respectively. The proteomic analysis showed distinct groups of proteins that are differently expressed in each group of patients, as well as in healthy subjects. Samples from healthy subjects and each tumor type were used for both mRNA and miRNA arrays. The mRNA analysis showed distinct groups of mRNAs that were overexpressed in healthy or in one of the three tumor types but not in the EVs of the other groups. The miRNA analysis showed distinct groups of miRNAs as well. The fold of regulation in the expression of the identified mRNA and miRNA of each stage of the disease from healthy subjects showed that various mRNAs and miRNAs could discriminate the disease stage. Overall, our data suggest many molecular marker candidates for distinguishing between healthy subjects and PC patients using the cargo of circulating vesicles, as well as markers to discriminate between the different tumor types. Once verified, these markers might have a diagnostic value for PC.