The ADVIA 2120 Hematology System was recently released by Bayer HealthCare, Diagnostics Division, as a bench-top analyzer designed for medium- to large-volume laboratories. This flow cytometry-based system uses light scatter, differential white blood cell (WBC) lysis, and myeloperoxidase and oxazine 750 staining to provide a complete blood cell count, a WBC differential, and a reticulocyte count. A cyanide-free method is used to measure hemoglobin colorimetrically. The system is automation ready; in addition to its capability for analyzing peripheral blood specimens, the analyzer is also equipped to analyze cerebrospinal fluid samples. In this article we explain the underlying technology of the ADVIA 2120, provide linearity ranges, method-specific reference ranges, and stability data, and describe novel parameters and applications that are unique to the methodology used by this instrument. Finally, we discuss research applications and future directions, such as the use of this hematology analyzer in the determination of fetal lung maturity.
A multinational interlaboratory task force explored the important variables of platelet reference counting and developed a candidate flow cytometric reference method based on the RBC/platelet ratio. A multicenter comparison was performed to determine whether the method met the necessary criteria and was precise enough to be recommended as a new reference method. Each laboratory analyzed serial dilutions of normal specimens, stabilized material, and at least 60 patient specimens with a range of platelet counts from 1 to 400 x 10(3)/microL (1-400 x 10(9)/L). Pooled analysis of the serial dilutions showed that RBC-platelet and RBC-RBC coincidence events became negligible at sufficiently high dilutions (i.e., > 1:1,000). All laboratories demonstrated excellent intra-assay and acceptable interlaboratory precision. Two antibodies (CD61 and CD41) were used for identifying platelets and individually gave acceptable results, but in a minority of samples, staining differences were observed. The optimum method thus uses a double-labeling procedure with a final dilution factor of 1:1,000. The study demonstrated that this method meets the criteria for a reference platelet count.
Clinical management of platelet disorders depends on accurate platelet counts. We evaluated a new analytic approach for platelet counting based on improved platelet discrimination. Current automated counting methods provide accurate platelet counts for most samples but often are unable to discriminate platelets accurately from nonplatelet particles such as microcytic RBCs, RBC fragments, and cellular debris that may falsely elevate platelet counts. The new approach measures 2 light-scatter angles of platelets and nonplatelet particles as they pass through a laser beam. The volume and refractive index of each platelet and particle are derived from the light-scatter measurements using the Mie scattering theory. Together, these 2 measurements provide improved platelet discrimination compared with 1-dimensional methods. With its improved discrimination, 2-dimensional platelet analysis provides more accurate platelet counts in samples containing interfering particles and may contribute to more effective clinical management of patients with platelet disorders.
We compared the performance of an automated method for obtaining RBC and WBC counts and WBC differential counts in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples with the reference manual method. Results from 325 samples from 10 worldwide clinical sites were used to demonstrate the accuracy, precision, and linearity of the method. Accuracy statistics for absolute cell counts showed a high correlation between methods, with correlation coefficients for all reportable absolute counts greater than 0.9. Linearity results demonstrated that the method provides accurate results throughout the reportable ranges, including clinical decision points for WBCs of 0 to 10/microL. Interassay precision and intra-assay precision for the ADVIA 120 (Bayer HealthCare, Tarrytown, NY) method were acceptable at all levels. The ADVIA 120 CSF Assay enumerates and differentiates cells via flow cytometry in a minimally diluted sample, improving the analysis of typically hypocellular CSF samples. Study results demonstrate that the automated ADVIA 120 CSF Assay is an acceptable alternative to the labor-intensive manual method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.