Fifteen centers for orthopaedic treatment of the foot and ankle participated in a prospective randomized trial to compare several nonoperative treatments for proximal plantar fasciitis (heel pain syndrome). Included were 236 patients (160 women and 76 men) who were 16 years of age or older. Most reported duration of symptoms of 6 months or less. Patients with systemic disease, significant musculoskeletal complaints, sciatica, or local nerve entrapment were excluded. We randomized patients prospectively into five different treatment groups. All groups performed Achilles tendon- and plantar fascia-stretching in a similar manner. One group was treated with stretching only. The other four groups stretched and used one of four different shoe inserts, including a silicone heel pad, a felt pad, a rubber heel cup, or a custom-made polypropylene orthotic device. Patients were reevaluated after 8 weeks of treatment. The percentages improved in each group were: (1) silicone insert, 95%; (2) rubber insert, 88%; (3) felt insert, 81%; (4)stretching only, 72%; and (5) custom orthosis, 68%. Combining all the patients who used a prefabricated insert, we found that their improvement rates were higher than those assigned to stretching only (P = 0.022) and those who stretched and used a custom orthosis (P = 0.0074). We conclude that, when used in conjunction with a stretching program, a prefabricated shoe insert is more likely to produce improvement in symptoms as part of the initial treatment of proximal plantar fasciitis than a custom polypropylene orthotic device.

Five patients with osteoid osteomas of the talar neck were treated at the Hospital for Special Surgery between 1981 and 1992. The course of care leading to definitive diagnosis and treatment was reviewed. All five of the patients had night pain relieved by aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. One of the five reported associated trauma. The average time from onset of symptoms to correct diagnosis was 2.5 years. Juxta-articular osteoid osteoma can cause a small spur that resembles a traction spur on the neck of the talus. Anterior ankle impingement was the most common misdiagnosis. Initial treatments included arthroscopic spur debridement or synovectomy, casting for fracture, and repeated nerve blocks for reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The five patients were cured by en bloc excision of the lesion. In the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma, a history of relief of pain with aspirin is important. Plain radiographs and a bone scan are useful. Fine cut computed tomography scanning or magnetic resonance imaging are the best studies for making a definitive diagnosis. Localization by computed tomography guided needle placement or intraoperative radionuclide scanning are recommended to find the lesion for excision. Intraoperative radiographs of the excised lesion should be used to confirm complete removal.

Background: Patients undergoing total ankle replacement (TAR) often have symptomatic adjacent joint arthritis and deformity. Subtalar arthrodesis can effectively address a degenerative and/or malaligned hindfoot, but there is concern that it places abnormal stresses on the TAR and adjacent joints of the foot, potentially leading to early TAR failure. This study hypothesized that ankle and talonavicular joint kinematics would be altered after subtalar arthrodesis in the setting of TAR. Methods: Thirteen mid-tibia cadaveric specimens with neutral alignment were tested in a robotic gait simulator. To simulate gait, each specimen was secured to a static mounting fixture about a 6-degree of freedom robotic platform, and a force plate moves relative to the stationary specimen based on standardized gait parameters. Specimens were tested sequentially in TAR and TAR with subtalar arthrodesis (TAR-STfuse). Kinematics and range of motion of the ankle and talonavicular joint were compared between TAR and TAR-STfuse. Results: There were significant differences in kinematics and range of motion between TAR and TAR-STfuse groups. At the ankle joint, TAR-STfuse had less internal rotation in early-mid stance ( P < .05), with decreased range of motion in the sagittal (–2.7 degrees, P = .008) and axial (–1.8 degrees, P = .002) planes in early stance, and increased range of motion in the coronal plane in middle (+1.2 degrees, P < .001) and late (+2.5 degrees, P = .012) stance. At the talonavicular joint, there were significant differences in axial and coronal kinematics in early and late stance ( P < .05). Subtalar arthrodesis resulted in significantly decreased talonavicular range of motion in all planes in early and late stance ( P < .003). Conclusion: In ankles implanted with the TAR design used in this study, kinematics of the ankle and talonavicular joint were found to be altered after subtalar arthrodesis. Aberrant motion may reflect altered contact mechanics at the prosthesis and increased stress at the bone-implant interface, and affect the progression of adjacent joint arthritis in the talonavicular joint. Clinical Relevance: These findings may provide a correlate to clinical studies that have cited hindfoot arthrodesis as a risk factor for TAR failure.

For information on pricing and availability of reprints, call 410-494-4994 x232.