The Children Act, 1989, requires that services for children are provided in partnership with parents and that the wishes and feelings of the child and his/her parents are ascertained and given due consideration (sect . 22) . As part of a research project assessing the quality of services to children with disabilities under the Children Act, the authors carried out evaluations of six residential respite care services. The services were used mainly by children with learning difficulties, some of whom had little or no speech. Staff at the schools attended by the children were asked to interview them, so that their views could be included in the evaluation reports . Interview schedules and aids to communication were devised to try and enable all the children to express their views . This article describes the initial schedules and the changes made in the light of experience during the research . The authors then summarise the children's responses and consider how the process of consultation could be improved in future .
This article summarises a symposium presented at the 1993 BILD conference by researchers based at the Norah Fry Research Centre, University of Bristol. The linking theme of the several contributions to the symposium was the need to involve people with learning difficulties in research. The article argues that a traditional model of research, in which detached observers set the agenda and present the results to their funders and academic colleagues, should not be seen as the only acceptable approach to research. This article advocates involving people with learning difficulties at every stage of the research process. The article then describes several pieces of work, carried out by or with the support of staff at Norah Fry, which illustrate the Centre's attempts to put this principle into practice. It is argued that the end result is better research, which is of more direct benefit to people with learning difficulties.This article summarises a symposium presented at the 1993 BILD conference by researchers from the Norah Fry Research Centre at the University of Bristol. The theme of the presentation was the involvement of people with learning difficulties in research.After exhorting service providers to involve service users in a whole range of activities, from hiring and firing staff to reviewing complaints procedures, we felt it was time to turn the spotlight on our own activities. Until recently, much of the research carried out in the field of disability has treated people with learning difficulties as objects of study, rather than people with opinions and information about what is important in their own lives. This traditional model of conducting research, where researchers act as detached observers, presenting their findings only to their funders and academic colleagues, has become the subject of much debate. This article briefly sets out the ways in which researchers at the Norah Fry Research Centre have tried to develop a more participatory approach to conducting research. We define 'research to include activities relating to making decisions about what to study, planning and carrying out the work itself, and producing and disseminating the findings in formats appropriate to the intended audi-ence. The article is therefore divided into three sections: setting the agenda, involvement in the research process, and making the results of research more accessible.
This article describes the quality of the partnerships between youth offending teams and substance misuse projects working with young offenders. It draws on local evaluations of 25 projects funded by the Youth Justice Board's Development Fund from 1999 to 2002. For the most part, the relationships were described in mainly positive terms but a number of areas of potential and actual conflict were identified, notably confidentiality, referral criteria and enforcement. The findings are compared with previous research on partnerships between criminal justice and voluntary agencies, which generally indicate similar advantages and tensions. To some extent, YOTs and projects were able to avoid some of the predictable tensions by careful liaison and planning. However, the speed of the tendering process and the practical complexities of setting up the projects at the same time as the YOTs themselves were coming into being made this difficult for some projects.This article describes and evaluates a major national initiative in encouraging partnership between youth offending teams (YOTs) and statutory and voluntary substance misuse agencies in working with young offenders. It compares the evaluation with the findings of previous research on partnerships in the criminal justice system and identifies a number of persistent challenges to the effectiveness of collaboration between agencies.The initiative took place within the context of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, one of many recent UK acts and policies explicitly intended to improve inter-agency and interdisciplinary working practices in social care and health. The Act established the Youth Justice Board (YJB) and local YOTs to conduct, co-ordinate and develop such work for youth offending, creating teams of youth justice workers from different professional backgrounds, including youth justice, probation, police, social work,
This paper examines some emerging evidence in relation to the impact of recent organisational changes in the delivery of youth justice services, and the implementation of National Standards for youth justice, on occupational culture in work with young offenders. It considers the potential conflict between traditional child centred youth justice practice and the new priorities set for Youth Offending Teams (YOTs) by the Youth Justice Board for England and Wales, and it draws attention to the possibility of a divergence in philosophy and practice between Wales and England. The paper highlights the uneasy philosophical differences that co-exist within YOTs, and it explores the respective perceptions of qualified practitioners and social work students on placement, concerning the state of current practice. Finally, the implications for those involved in the education and training of social work students are briefly considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.