Drowsiness is a leading cause of traffic and industrial accidents, costing lives and productivity. Electroencephalography (EEG) signals can reflect awareness and attentiveness, and low-cost consumer EEG headsets are available on the market. The use of these devices as drowsiness detectors could increase the accessibility of safety and productivity-enhancing devices for small businesses and developing countries. We conducted a systemic review of currently available, low-cost, consumer EEG-based drowsiness detection systems. We sought to determine whether consumer EEG headsets could be reliably utilized as rudimentary drowsiness detection systems. We included documented cases describing successful drowsiness detection using consumer EEG-based devices, including the Neurosky MindWave, InteraXon Muse, Emotiv Epoc, Emotiv Insight, and OpenBCI. Of 46 relevant studies, ∼27 reported an accuracy score. The lowest of these was the Neurosky Mindwave, with a minimum of 31%. The second lowest accuracy reported was 79.4% with an OpenBCI study. In many cases, algorithmic optimization remains necessary. Different methods for accuracy calculation, system calibration, and different definitions of drowsiness made direct comparisons problematic. However, even basic features, such as the power spectra of EEG bands, were able to consistently detect drowsiness. Each specific device has its own capabilities, tradeoffs, and limitations. Widely used spectral features can achieve successful drowsiness detection, even with low-cost consumer devices; however, reliability issues must still be addressed in an occupational context.

This work demonstrates that parameter selection based on physical constraints rather than labelled data can provide effective, fully-automated, unsupervised spindle detection. This work also exposes the dangers of applying cross-validation without considering the dependence of spindle properties on parameters. Parameters selected to optimize one performance metric or matching method are not optimized for others. Furthermore, elucidation of the stability of predicted indicators with respect to algorithm parameter selection is critical to practical application of these algorithms.

Biosignal classification systems often have to deal with extraneous features, highly imbalanced datasets, and a low SNR. A robust feature selection/reduction method is a crucial step in this process. Sets of artificial data were generated to test a prototype EEG-based microsleep detection system, consisting of a combination of EEG and 2-s bursts of 15-Hz sinusoids of varied signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from 16 to 0.03. The balance between events and non-events was varied between evenly balanced and highly imbalanced (e.g., events occurring only 2% of the time). Features were spectral estimates of various EEG bands (e.g., alpha band power) or ratios between them. A total of 34 features for each of the 16 channels yielded a total of 544 features. Five minutes of EEG from a total of eight subjects were used in the generation of the artificial data. Several feature reduction and classifier structures were investigated. Taking only a single feature corresponding to the maximum of average distance between events and non-events (ADEN) on unbalanced data yielded a phi correlation of 0.94 on the mock data with an SNR of 0.3, compared with a phi coefficient of 0.00 for principal component analysis (PCA). ADEN consistently outperformed alternative system configurations, independent of the classifier utilized. While ADEN's high performance may be due to the nature of the artificial dataset, this simulation has demonstrated strong potential compared to other feature selection/reduction methods.

A non-invasive, brain-to-brain interface (BBI) requires precision neuromodulation and high temporal resolution as well as portability to increase accessibility. A BBI is a combination of the brain-computer interface (BCI) and the computer-brain interface (CBI). The optimization of BCI parameters has been extensively researched, but CBI has not. Parameters taken from the BCI and CBI literature were used to simulate a two-class medical monitoring BBI system under a wide range of conditions. BBI function was assessed using the information transfer rate (ITR), measured in bits per trial and bits per minute. The BBI ITR was a function of classifier accuracy, window update rate, system latency, stimulation failure rate (SFR), and timeout threshold. The BCI parameters, including window length, update rate, and classifier accuracy, were kept constant to investigate the effects of varying the CBI parameters, including system latency, SFR, and timeout threshold. Based on passively monitoring BCI parameters, a base ITR of 1 bit/trial was used. The optimal latency was found to be 100 ms or less, with a threshold no more than twice its value. With the optimal latency and timeout parameters, the system was able to maintain near-maximum efficiency, even with a 25% SFR. When the CBI and BCI parameters are compared, the CBI's system latency and timeout threshold should be reflected in the BCI's update rate. This would maximize the number of trials, even at a high SFR. These findings suggested that a higher number of trials per minute optimizes the ITR of a non-invasive BBI. The delays innate to each BCI protocol and CBI stimulation method must also be accounted for. The high latencies in each are the primary constraints of non-invasive BBI for the foreseeable future.