SummaryThe importance of minimising aortocaval compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in late pregnancy is widely accepted. Current European guidelines suggest employing manual displacement of the uterus with left lateral tilt to achieve this. Several methods for producing lateral tilt have been described; however, the optimum method is unknown. By performing simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation on a manikin, we compared four of these methods: a folded labour ward pillow; a pre-formed foam wedge; a custom-made hard wooden wedge; and the 'human wedge'. Primary outcome measures were maintenance of adequate tilt, stability and effectiveness of chest compressions (rate, depth and adequate release). Overall, the foam and wooden wedges were significantly more stable and reliable at maintaining tilt than the pillow (p < 0.0001); the wooden wedge was more stable and effective than the foam wedge (p < 0.0001). Chest compressions were least effective with the human wedge (p = 0.02). Effectiveness of chest compressions with lateral tilt was comparable to that reported previously in supine manikin studies. We recommend the use of dedicated foam or hard wedges rather than pillows or the human wedge for producing lateral tilt during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
SummaryPrevention of aortocaval compression is essential for effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation in late pregnancy. This can be achieved by either lateral maternal tilt or lateral uterine displacement. Results from a previous manikin study show that a firm foam-rubber wedge allowed successful chest compressions whilst providing stable and reliable lateral tilt. However, it did not investigate resuscitation in the supine position with manual uterine displacement. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of chest compressions in a manikin in the supine position vs lateral tilt using a foam-rubber wedge, both on the floor and on a typical patient bed. Overall, we found that compressions were easier to perform in the supine position (p = 0.007 (bed) and 0.048 (floor)), and with greater stability in the supine position on the floor (p = 0.011). The effectiveness of chest compressions was similar in both the supine/uterine displacement and the lateral tilt positions, suggesting that either method may be suitable for CPR.
During central neuraxial blockade, identifying the midline in parturients can be difficult, particularly if they are obese. We assessed the ability of women in late pregnancy, both obese and non-obese, to identify the midline of their own back by pointing and by pinprick discrimination with reference to the true midline identified by ultrasound. Thirteen out of 25 (52%) obese women were accurate to within 5 mm in identifying the midline of their back by pointing with their fingertip, compared with 21/25 (84%) non-obese women (p = 0.03). The median (IQR [range]) fingertip-midline distance was greater in obese women (5 (5-10 [0-10]) mm compared with non-obese women (2 (0-5 [0-12]) mm; p = 0.007). Identification of the midline using pinprick was poorer by obese women (median (IQR [range]) 33 (25-45 [3-85]) mm) than by non-obese women (18 (13-25 [8-40]) mm; p < 0.0001). However, women in both groups were correct > 99% of the time in identifying that a stimulus was either to the left or to the right side.
SummaryThe performance of the occlusion and Pethick tests in detecting faulty inner tubes in co-axial circle and Bain systems was compared. Twelve co-axial circle and 12 Bain anaesthetic breathing systems were tested using the occlusion and the Pethick tests. For each system, three tubes were intact, and the remaining nine had a defect deliberately created in the inner tube (three proximal, three middle and three distal). The investigators were blinded to which of the tubes were defective, and to each other's results. The results showed 100% specificity for both tests. The sensitivity of the occlusion test for detecting faulty breathing systems was found to be good (98%). Our results suggest that the occlusion test should be performed in preference to the Pethick test when testing co-axial circle and Bain systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.