Abstract. Soil moisture has important implications for drought and flooding forecasting, forest fire prediction and water supply management. However, mapping soil moisture has remained a scientific challenge due to forest canopy cover and small-scale variations in soil moisture conditions. When accurately scaled, terrain indices constitute a good candidate for modelling the spatial variation of soil moisture conditions in many landscapes. In this study, we evaluated seven different terrain indices at varying digital elevation model (DEM) resolutions and user-defined thresholds as well as two available soil moisture maps, using an extensive field dataset (398 plots) of soil moisture conditions registered in five classes from a survey covering a (68 km2) boreal landscape. We found that the variation in soil moisture conditions could be explained by terrain indices, and the best predictors within the studied landscape were the depth to water index (DTW) and a machine-learning-generated map. Furthermore, this study showed a large difference between terrain indices in the effects of changing DEM resolution and user-defined thresholds, which severely affected the performance of the predictions. For example, the commonly used topographic wetness index (TWI) performed best on a resolution of 16 m, while TWI calculated on DEM resolutions higher than 4 m gave inaccurate results. In contrast, depth to water (DTW) and elevation above stream (EAS) were more stable and performed best on 1–2 m DEM resolution. None of the terrain indices performed best on the highest DEM resolution of 0.5 m. In addition, this study highlights the challenges caused by heterogeneous soil types within the study area and shows the need of local knowledge when interpreting the modelled results. The results from this study clearly demonstrate that when using terrain indices to represent soil moisture conditions, modelled results need to be validated, as selecting an unsuitable DEM resolution or user-defined threshold can give ambiguous and even incorrect results.
<p>Open peatlands are a recognizable feature in the boreal landscape that are commonly mapped from aerial photographs. However, wet soils also occur on tree covered peatlands and in the riparian zones of forest streams and surrounding lakes. Comparisons between field data and available maps show that only 36 % of wet soils in the boreal landscape are marked on maps, making them difficult to manage. Wet soils have lower bearing capacity than dry soils and are more susceptible to soil disturbance from land-use management with heavy machinery. Topographical modelling of wet area indices has been suggested as a solution to this problem and high-resolution digital elevation models (DEM) derived from airborne LiDAR are becoming accessible in many countries. However, most of these topographical methods relies on the user to define appropriate threshold values in order to define wet areas. Soil textures, topography and climatic differences make any application difficult on a large scale. This complex landscape variability can be captured by utilizing machine learners that uses automated data mining methods to discover patterns in large data sets. By using soil moisture data from 20&#160;000 field plots from the National Forest Inventory of Sweden, we combined information from 24 indices and ancillary environmental features using a machine learning known as extreme gradient boosting. Extreme gradient boosting used the field data to learn how to classify soil moisture and delivered high performance compared to many traditional single algorithm methods. With this method we mapped soil moisture at 2 m spatial resolution across the Swedish forest landscape in five days using a workstation with 32 cores. This new map captured 79 % (kappa 0.69) of all wet soils compared to only 36 % (kappa 0.39) captured by current maps. In addition to capture open wetlands this new map also capture riparian zones and previously unmapped cryptic wetlands underneath the forest canopy. The new maps can, for example, be used to plan hydrologically adapted buffer zones, suggest machine free zones near streams and lakes in order to prevent rutting from forestry machines to reduce sediment, mercury and nutrient loads to downstream streams, lakes and sea.</p>
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.