This paper proposes a segmentation-free radiomics method to classify malignant and benign breast tumors with shear-wave elastography (SWE) data. The method is targeted to integrate the advantage of both SWE in providing important elastic with morphology information and convolutional neural network (CNN) in automatic feature extraction and accurate classification. Compared to traditional methods, the proposed method is designed to directly extract features from the dataset without the prerequisite of segmentation and manual operation. This can keep the peri-tumor information, which is lost by segmentation-based methods. With the proposed model trained on 540 images (318 of malignant breast tumors and 222 of benign breast tumors, respectively), an accuracy of 95.8%, a sensitivity of 96.2%, and a specificity of 95.7% was obtained for the final test. The superior performances compared to the existing state-of-the-art methods and its automatic nature both demonstrate that the proposed method has a great potential to be applied to clinical computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer.

ObjectiveTo investigate whether a radiomics model can help to improve the performance of PI-RADS v2.1 in prostate cancer (PCa).MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 203 patients with pathologically confirmed PCa or non-PCa between March 2015 and December 2016. Patients were divided into a training set (n = 141) and a validation set (n = 62). The radiomics model (Rad-score) was developed based on multi-parametric MRI including T2 weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) imaging, and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging. The combined model involving Rad-score and PI-RADS was compared with PI-RADS for the diagnosis of PCa by using the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.ResultsA total of 112 (55.2%) patients had PCa, and 91 (44.8%) patients had benign lesions. For PCa versus non-PCa, the Rad-score had a significantly higher area under the ROC curve (AUC) [0.979 (95% CI, 0.940–0.996)] than PI-RADS [0.905 (0.844–0.948), P = 0.002] in the training set. However, the AUC between them was insignificant in the validation set [0.861 (0.749–0.936) vs. 0.845 (0.731–0.924), P = 0.825]. When Rad-score was added to PI-RADS, the performance of the PI-RADS was significantly improved for the PCa diagnosis (AUC = 0.989, P < 0.001 for the training set and AUC = 0.931, P = 0.038 for the validation set).ConclusionsThe radiomics based on multi-parametric MRI can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2.1 in PCa.

No abstract

No abstract