Bacillus subtilis TnrA, a global regulator of transcription, responds to nitrogen availability, but the specific signal to which it responds has been elusive. Genetic studies indicate that glutamine synthetase is required for the regulation of TnrA activity in vivo. We report here that the feedback-inhibited form of glutamine synthetase directly interacts with TnrA and blocks the DNA binding activity of TnrA. Mutations in the tnrA gene (tnrA(C)) that allow constitutive high level expression of tnrA-activated genes were isolated and characterized. Feedback-inhibited glutamine synthetase had a significantly reduced ability to block the in vitro DNA binding by three of the TnrA(C) proteins. Thus, glutamine synthetase, an enzyme of central metabolism, directly interacts with and regulates the DNA binding activity of TnrA.

SummaryA Bacillus subtilis mutant that partially relieves carbon catabolite repression (CCR) of the hut operon was isolated by transposon mutagenesis. Characterization of this mutant revealed that the transposon had inserted into the gene, mfd, that encodes transcription-repair coupling factor. The Mfd protein is known to promote strand-specific DNA repair by displacing RNA polymerase stalled at a nucleotide lesion and directing the (A)BC excinuclease to the DNA damage site. A set of transcriptional lacZ fusions was used to demonstrate that the mfd mutation relieves CCR of hut and gnt expression at the cis-acting cre sequences located downstream of the transcriptional start site but does not affect CCR at sites located at the promoters. CCR of the amyE and bglPH genes, which contain cre sequences that overlap their promoters, is not altered by the mfd mutation. These results support a model in which the Mfd protein displaces RNA polymerase stalled at downstream cre sites that function as transcriptional roadblocks and reveal a new role for Mfd in cellular physiology.

Two Bacillus subtilis transcriptional factors, TnrA and GlnR, regulate gene expression in response to changes in nitrogen availability. These two proteins have similar amino acid sequences in their DNA binding domains and bind to DNA sites (GlnR/TnrA sites) that have the same consensus sequence. Expression of the tnrA gene was found to be activated by TnrA and repressed by GlnR. Mutational analysis demonstrated that a GlnR/ TnrA site which lies immediately upstream of the ؊35 region of the tnrA promoter is required for regulation of tnrA expression by both GlnR and TnrA. Expression of the glnRA operon, which contains two GlnR/TnrA binding sites (glnRAo1 and glnRAo2) in its promoter region, is repressed by both GlnR and TnrA. The glnRAo2 site, which overlaps the ؊35 region of the glnRA promoter, was shown to be required for regulation by both GlnR and TnrA, while the glnRAo1 site which lies upstream of the ؊35 promoter region is only involved in GlnR-mediated regulation. Examination of TnrA binding to tnrA and glnRA promoter DNA in gel mobility shift experiments showed that TnrA bound with an equilibrium dissociation binding constant of 55 nM to the GlnR/TnrA site in the tnrA promoter region, while the affinities of TnrA for the two GlnR/TnrA sites in the glnRA promoter region were greater than 3 M. These results demonstrate that GlnR and TnrA cross-regulate each other's expression and that there are differences in their DNA-binding specificities.

No abstract