Aims It is unknown whether kinematic alignment (KA) objectively improves knee balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), despite this being the biomechanical rationale for its use. This study aimed to determine whether restoring the constitutional alignment using a restrictive KA protocol resulted in better quantitative knee balance than mechanical alignment (MA). Methods We conducted a randomized superiority trial comparing patients undergoing TKA assigned to KA within a restrictive safe zone or MA. Optimal knee balance was defined as an intercompartmental pressure difference (ICPD) of 15 psi or less using a pressure sensor. The primary endpoint was the mean intraoperative ICPD at 10° of flexion prior to knee balancing. Secondary outcomes included balance at 45° and 90°, requirements for balancing procedures, and presence of tibiofemoral lift-off. Results A total of 63 patients (70 knees) were randomized to KA and 62 patients (68 knees) to MA. Mean ICPD at 10° flexion in the KA group was 11.7 psi (SD 13.1) compared with 32.0 psi in the MA group (SD 28.9), with a mean difference in ICPD between KA and MA of 20.3 psi (p < 0.001). Mean ICPD in the KA group was significantly lower than in the MA group at 45° and 90°, respectively (25.2 psi MA vs 14.8 psi KA, p = 0.004; 19.1 psi MA vs 11.7 psi KA, p < 0.002, respectively). Overall, participants in the KA group were more likely to achieve optimal knee balance (80% vs 35%; p < 0.001). Bone recuts to achieve knee balance were more likely to be required in the MA group (49% vs 9%; p < 0.001). More participants in the MA group had tibiofemoral lift-off (43% vs 13%; p < 0.001). Conclusion This study provides persuasive evidence that restoring the constitutional alignment with KA in TKA results in a statistically significant improvement in quantitative knee balance, and further supports this technique as a viable alternative to MA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(1):117–124

Background The accuracy of surgeon-deined assessment (SDA) of soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is poorly understood despite balance being considered a signiicant determinant of surgical success. The study's hypothesis was that intra-operative SDA is a poor predictor of coronal balance in TKA. Methods A prospective, multicenter study assessing accuracy of SDA of balance was conducted in 250 patients (285 TKAs). Eight surgeons and thirteen trainees participated, and all were blinded to sensor measurements. The primary outcome was test accuracy of SDA measured at 10°, 45° and 90° compared to sensor measures as the gold standard test. Cohen's kappa coeicient was calculated to determine chance-corrected agreement. Secondary outcomes include the relationship of SDA to level of surgical experience, analysis of between-surgeon diferences, and the inluence of patient and operative factors on SDA accuracy. Results Average accuracy of SDA was 58.3%, 61.2% and 66.5% at 10°, 45° and 90° respectively. Cohen's kappa coeicient was 0.18 at all angles and rated as "slight agreement". SDA sensitivities to correctly identify a balanced knee (76.2% at 10°; 82.6% at 45°; 83.2% at 90°) were approximately twice speciicities to correctly identify an unbalanced knee (42.6% at 10°; 34.1% at 45°; 41.4% at 90°). Surgical experience (surgeon versus trainee) had no efect on capacity to determine balance. Considerable between-surgeon variability was found (33-65% at 10°, 41-73% at 45°, 55-89% at 90°). Conclusion SDA was a poor predictor of balance, particularly when assessing the unbalanced TKA. Surgeon experience had no efect on test accuracy and considerable between-surgeon variability was recorded. These indings question the accuracy of SDA in TKA. Trial Registration Number: ACTRN# 12618000817246.

No abstract

Purpose Biomechanical studies suggest that PF tracking is not reliably restored to physiological values in TKA despite surgical technique optimization. A clinical observation is that current TKA designs may not replicate anterior femoral offset. The aim was to examine the intraoperative resection thicknesses of the anterior femoral condyles during TKA and correlate these findings relative to modern prostheses. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of 199 patients who underwent 233 TKAs using a single implant design with measured anterior femoral condylar resection thicknesses. The aim was to restore posterior condylar offset whilst minimizing overstuffing of the anterior compartment of the knee by choosing the smallest prosthesis to allow for the maximal anterior resection as close to the cortex without inducing notching. Prosthetic measurements from 7 commonly used TKAs were collected by analysis of 3D models of median sized explants. Results An average of 7.9 mm (SD 2.5 mm, range 2–16.5 mm) and 11.5 mm (SD 2.5 mm, range 2–21 mm) was resected from the medial and lateral aspects of the anterior femur, respectively. The average anterior flange thickness for the prosthesis data set was 6.6 mm (SD 0.6 mm, range 6.1–7.9 mm) medially and 7.6 mm (SD 0.7 mm, range 6.8–9.0 mm) laterally. Comparison across patients who received the median prosthesis size of 5 (SD 1.3, range 2–8) was inadequately restored by 1.4 mm (p < 0.00001) medially and 3.4 mm (p < 0.00001) laterally. Conclusion Host anatomy is not routinely restored during TKA. The surgical teaching to aim for an anterior femoral osteotomy close to the anterior cortex will result in understuffing of the PFJ and based on current prosthesis designs, the risk of overstuffing is not as significant as once believed. Future prostheses and surgical techniques should aim to restore not only posterior femoral but also anterior femoral offset. Level of evidence IV, Case series.

Purpose Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) relies on precise determination of constitutional alignment to set resection targets. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) is a radiographic method to estimate constitutional alignment following onset of arthritis. Intraoperatively, constitutional alignment may also be approximated using navigation-based angular measurements of deformity correction, termed the stressed HKA (sHKA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these methods of estimating constitutional alignment to better understand their utility in KA TKA. Methods A radiological and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation study was undertaken comparing measurements of the aHKA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT-aHKA) to the sHKA in 88 TKAs meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the difference in the paired means between the three methods to determine constitutional alignment (aHKA, CT-aHKA, sHKA). Secondary outcomes included testing agreement across measurements using Bland-Altman plots and analysis of subgroup differences based on different patterns of compartmental arthritis. Results There were no statistically significant differences between any paired comparison or across groups (aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.1°, p = 0.817; aHKA vs. CT-aHKA: 0.3°, p = 0.643; CT-aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.2°, p = 0.722; ANOVA, p = 0.845). Bland-Altman plots were consistent with good agreement for all comparisons, with approximately 95% of values within limits of agreement. There was no difference in the three paired comparisons (aHKA, CT-aHKA, and sHKA) for knees with medial compartment arthritis. However, these findings were not replicated in knees with lateral compartment arthritis. Conclusions There was no significant difference between the arithmetic HKA (whether obtained using CT or radiographs) and the stressed HKA in this analysis. These findings further validate the preoperative arithmetic method and support use of the intraoperative stressed HKA as techniques to restore constitutional lower limb alignment in KA TKA. Level of evidence III.