Graphene-based biosensors have attracted considerable attention due to their advantages of label-free detection and high sensitivity. Many such biosensors utilize noncovalent van der Waals force to attach proteins onto graphene surface while preserving graphene's high conductivity. Maintaining the protein structure without denaturation/substantial conformational change and controlling proper protein orientation on the graphene surface are critical for biosensing applications of these biosensors fabricated with proteins on graphene. Based on the knowledge we obtained from our previous experimental study and computer modeling of amino acid residual level interactions between graphene and peptides, here we systemically redesigned an important protein for better conformational stability and desirable orientation on graphene. In this paper, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody-binding domain of protein G (protein GB1) was studied to demonstrate how we can preserve the protein native structure and control the protein orientation on graphene surface by redesigning protein mutants. Various experimental tools including sum frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy, attenuated total refection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, and circular dichroism spectroscopy were used to study the protein GB1 structure on graphene, supplemented by molecular dynamics simulations. By carefully designing the protein GB1 mutant, we can avoid strong unfavorable interactions between protein and graphene to preserve protein conformation and to enable the protein to adopt a preferred orientation. The methodology developed in this study is general and can be applied to study different proteins on graphene and beyond. With the knowledge obtained from this research, one could apply this method to optimize protein function on surfaces (e.g., to enhance biosensor sensitivity).

Rieske oxygenases exploit the reactivity of iron to perform chemically challenging C–H bond functionalization reactions. Thus far, only a handful of Rieske oxygenases have been structurally characterized and remarkably little information exists regarding how these enzymes use a common architecture and set of metallocenters to facilitate a diverse range of reactions. Herein, we detail how two Rieske oxygenases SxtT and GxtA use different protein regions to influence the site-selectivity of their catalyzed monohydroxylation reactions. We present high resolution crystal structures of SxtT and GxtA with the native β-saxitoxinol and saxitoxin substrates bound in addition to a Xenon-pressurized structure of GxtA that reveals the location of a substrate access tunnel to the active site. Ultimately, this structural information allowed for the identification of six residues distributed between three regions of SxtT that together control the selectivity of the C–H hydroxylation event. Substitution of these residues produces a SxtT variant that is fully adapted to exhibit the non-native site-selectivity and substrate scope of GxtA. Importantly, we also found that these selectivity regions are conserved in other structurally characterized Rieske oxygenases, providing a framework for predictively repurposing and manipulating Rieske oxygenases as biocatalysts.

Rieske nonheme iron oxygenases use two metallocenters, a Rieske-type [2Fe-2S] cluster and a mononuclear iron center, to catalyze oxidation reactions on a broad range of substrates. These enzymes are widely used by microorganisms to degrade environmental pollutants and to build complexity in a myriad of biosynthetic pathways that are industrially interesting. However, despite the value of this chemistry, there is a dearth of understanding regarding the structure–function relationships in this enzyme class, which limits our ability to rationally redesign, optimize, and ultimately exploit the chemistry of these enzymes. Therefore, in this work, by leveraging a combination of available structural information and state-of-the-art protein modeling tools, we show that three “hotspot” regions can be targeted to alter the site selectivity, substrate preference, and substrate scope of the Rieske oxygenase p-toluenesulfonate methyl monooxygenase (TsaM). Through mutation of six to 10 residues distributed between three protein regions, TsaM was engineered to behave as either vanillate monooxygenase (VanA) or dicamba monooxygenase (DdmC). This engineering feat means that TsaM was rationally engineered to catalyze an oxidation reaction at the meta and ortho positions of an aromatic substrate, rather than its favored native para position, and that TsaM was redesigned to perform chemistry on dicamba, a substrate that is not natively accepted by the enzyme. This work thus contributes to unlocking our understanding of structure–function relationships in the Rieske oxygenase enzyme class and expands foundational principles for future engineering of these metalloenzymes.

Surfaces with chemically immobilized antimicrobial peptides have been shown to have great potential in various applications such as biosensors and antimicrobial coatings. This research investigated the chemical immobilization of a cecropin-melittin hybrid antimicrobial peptide on two different surfaces, a polymer surface prepared by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) polymerization and a self-assembled monolayer surface. We probed the structure of immobilized peptides using spectroscopic methods and correlated such structural information to the measured antimicrobial activity. We found that the hybrid peptide adopts an α-helical structure after immobilization onto both surfaces. As we have shown previously for another α-helical peptide, MSI-78, immobilized on a SAM, we found that the α-helical hybrid peptide lies down when it contacts bacteria. This study shows that the antimicrobial activity of the surface-immobilized peptides on the two substrates can be well explained by the spectroscopically measured peptide structural data. In addition, it was found that the polymer-based antimicrobial peptide coating is more stable. This is likely due to the fact that the SAM prepared using silane may be degraded after several days whereas the polymer prepared by CVD polymerization is more stable than the SAM, leading to a more stable antimicrobial coating.

Single layered two-dimensional (2D) materials such as transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) show great potential in many microelectronic or nanoelectronic applications. For example, because of extremely high sensitivity, TMD-based biosensors have become promising candidates for next-generation label-free detection. However, very few studies have been conducted on understanding the fundamental interactions between TMDs and other molecules including biological molecules, making the rational design of TMD-based sensors (including biosensors) difficult. This study focuses on the investigations of the fundamental interactions between proteins and two widely researched single-layered TMDs, MoS2, and WS2 using a combined study with linear vibrational spectroscopy attenuated total reflectance FTIR and nonlinear vibrational spectroscopy sum frequency generation vibrational spectroscopy, supplemented by molecular dynamics simulations. It was concluded that a large surface hydrophobic region in a relatively flat location on the protein surface is required for the protein to adsorb onto a monolayered MoS2 or WS2 surface with preferred orientation. No disulfide bond formation between cysteine groups on the protein and MoS2 or WS2 was found. The conclusions are general and can be used as guiding principles to engineer proteins to attach to TMDs. The approach adopted here is also applicable to study interactions between other 2D materials and biomolecules.

No abstract

Organisms have a myriad of strategies for sensing, responding to, and combating reactive oxygen species, which are unavoidable consequences of aerobic life. In the heterocystous cyanobacterium Nostoc sp. PCC 7120, one such strategy is the use of an ArsR-SmtB transcriptional regulator RexT that senses H2O2 and upregulates expression of thioredoxin to maintain cellular redox homeostasis. Different from many other members of the ArsR-SmtB family which bind metal ions, RexT has been proposed to use disulfide bond formation as a trigger to bind and release DNA. Here, we present high-resolution crystal structures of RexT in the reduced and H2O2-treated states. These structures reveal that RexT showcases the ArsR-SmtB winged-helix-turn-helix fold and forms a vicinal disulfide bond to orchestrate a response to H2O2. The importance of the disulfide-forming Cys residues was corroborated using site-directed mutagenesis, mass spectrometry, and H2O2-consumption assays. Furthermore, an entrance channel for H2O2 was identified and key residues implicated in H2O2 activation were pinpointed. Finally, bioinformatics analysis of the ArsR-SmtB family indicates that the vicinal disulfide “redox switch” is a unique feature of cyanobacteria in the Nostocales order, presenting an interesting case where an ArsR-SmtB protein scaffold has been evolved to showcase peroxidatic activity and facilitate redox-based regulation.

Rieske Oxygenases are enzymes that showcase the remarkable ability to functionalize an inert C–H bond. These enzymes use a Rieske [2Fe‐2S] cluster and a mononuclear iron center to bind and activate molecular oxygen. Using these metallocenters, Rieske Oxygenases have been shown to catalyze a variety of reactions, including one, two, and sequential hydroxylation reactions. This chemistry is important to the biosynthetic pathways of multiple organisms and is thus attractive for industrially building and tailoring natural product scaffolds. Similarly, the chemistry of the Rieske Oxygenases is abundant in degradative pathways and therefore offers compelling strategies for degrading environmental pollutants. However, a traditional lack of structure–function information for this expansive class of enzymes has restricted our ability to capitalize on these important and diverse catalytic strategies. Therefore, our laboratory is working to understand the architectural features of these enzymes that allow them to control and facilitate catalysis. Here, we present our current understanding of how these enzymes selectively catalyze reactions and use structure to guide chemical outcome.