Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is increasing in incidence in solid organ transplant recipients and has a high (up to 83%) associated mortality rate. Until recently, there have been no consistently effective antimicrobial therapies for VRE infection. Linezolid is a new antibiotic that belongs to the class of oxazolidinones approved by the FDA for the treatment of VRE infections, including those with bacteremia. Here, we report the experience with linezolid in an open-label, compassionate-use trial at 53 US centers for the treatment of documented VRE infections in patients with solid organ transplants. Eighty-five patients with solid organ transplants and documented VRE infections were studied. Blood cultures were positive for VRE in 43 patients, while 42 patients had other, non-rectal, sites of infection. Fifty-three patients responded well to treatment, with clinical resolution of the infection (62.4% survival rate). Of these, 47 had documented negative cultures post therapy. The mean duration of therapy for cured patients was 23.5 days. Thirty-two (37.6%) patients died, 28 due to sepsis and organ failure (32.9% failure rate), and 4 due to unrelated causes. Mortality rates for patients with bacteremia were comparable to mortality rates observed with patients who had positive cultures from other sites. Adverse reactions to linezolid included thrombocytopenia (4.7%), decreased leukocyte count (3.5%), and an increase in blood pressure (1.2%), none of which led to discontinuation of therapy. Linezolid appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for VRE, even in the presence of bacteremia, and may lead to decreased mortality in solid organ transplant recipients with VRE infection.
Introduction By the time they complete breast cancer therapy, many young patients are still of childbearing age. We aim to estimate the incidence of pregnancies in women who completed treatment and examine the percentage of patients who received fertility counseling before initiation of therapy. Material and methods Electronic health records of breast cancer patients between 2008 and 2014 at AUBMC were screened for exclusion criteria of having metastatic disease or known infertility, still receiving therapy, and being above 42 years at diagnosis. Data about therapy and tumor characteristics was obtained for the included survivors who were interviewed as well via telephone for information about fertility preservation counseling, pregnancy occurrence, and delivery. Results 451 breast cancer patients were identified. 39 patients remained after application of exclusion criteria. 30.76% (n = 12) wanted more children at the time of diagnosis. 10.25% (n = 4) of all 39 patients treated for breast cancer achieved one or more pregnancy after a median time of 3.83 years after completion of therapy. 25% (n = 3) of women who wanted more children at diagnosis (n = 12) were able to conceive. 23.07% (n = 9) of patients discussed fertility with their primary oncologist prior to treatment initiation. 35.89% (n = 14) of patients were aware of fertility preservation technique availability, but none of these patients used one. Conclusions The observed rate of pregnancy is comparable to the literature. There is a lack in fertility counseling of breast cancer patients, and the rate of use of fertility preservation techniques is very low despite prior knowledge about their availability.
Introduction. Decisions regarding whether advanced cancer patients should be admitted to the ICU are based on a complex suite of considerations, including short- and long-term prognosis, quality of life, and therapeutic options to treat cancer. We aimed to describe demographic, clinical, and survival data and to identify factors associated with mortality in critically ill advanced cancer patients with nonelective admissions to general ICUs. Materials and Methods. Critically ill adult (≥18 years old) cancer patients nonelectively admitted to the intensive care units at the American University of Beirut Medical Center between August 1st 2015 and March 1st 2019 were included. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were prospectively collected from the first day of ICU admission up to 30 days after discharge. This study was strictly observational, and clinical decisions were left to the discretion of the ICU team and attending physician. Results. 272 patients were enrolled in the study between August 1st 2015 and March 1st 2019, with an ICU mortality rate of 43.4%, with the number rising to 59% within 30 days of ICU discharge. The mean length of stay in our ICU was 14 days (IQR: 1–120) with a median overall survival of 22 days since the date of ICU admission. The major reasons for unplanned ICU admission were sepsis/septic shock (54%) and respiratory failure (33.1%). Cox regression analysis revealed 7 major predictors of poor prognosis. Direct admission from the ED was associated with a higher risk of mortality (48.9%) than being transferred from the floor (32.6%) ( p = 0.014 ). Conclusion. Our study has shown that being directly admitted to the ICU from the ED rather than being transferred from regular wards, developing AKI, sepsis, MOF, and ARDS, or having an uncontrolled malignancy are all predictive factors for short-term mortality in critically ill cancer patients nonelectively admitted to the ICU. Vasopressor use and mechanical ventilation were also predictors of mortality.
Introduction. Advances in genomic techniques have been valuable in guiding decisions regarding the treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) patients. These multigene assays include Oncotype DX, Prosigna, and Endopredict. There has generally been a tendency to overtreat or undertreat patients, and having reliable prognostic factors could significantly improve rates of appropriate treatment administration. In this study, we showcase the impact of genomic tests on adjuvant treatment decisions in EBC patients. Materials and Methods. This is a retrospective study that includes EBC patients treated between December 2016 and February 2018. The physician’s choice of treatment was recorded before and after obtaining the results of the genomics tests. Baseline demographics and pathological data were collected from medical records. Results. A total of 75 patients were included. Fifty patients underwent Oncotype DX genomic analysis, 11 patients underwent Prosigna analysis, and 14 patients underwent Endopredict analysis. A total of 21 physicians’ plans (28%) were initially undecided and then carried out after obtaining genomic test results. 13 patients were planned to undergo endocrine therapy alone, while 8 were planned to undergo both endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. Treatment was changed in 26 patients (34.67%). The decision to deescalate therapy was taken in 19 patients (25.33%). The decision to escalate treatment was made in 7 patients (9.33%). Conclusion. Our study demonstrates the importance of genomics testing, as it assisted physicians in avoiding unnecessary adjuvant chemotherapy in 25.33% of patients, thus reducing side effects of chemotherapy and the financial burden on patients.
Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rare syndrome in which widespread activation of the immune system leads to a state of excessive inflammation causing tissue damage. While this condition is mainly established in the pediatric population; due to its rarity, physicians often do not suspect this condition in adults. However, while diagnostic criteria are based on protocols tailored for the pediatric society, recognizing this condition in a timely manner in adults is utterly important to prevent a dismal prognosis. In instances where a concomitant rheumatological disorder is present, the syndrome is referred to as macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). This report describes a case of an adult patient who presented with mucosal bleeding and abdominal pain who was later diagnosed with MAS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.