To improve the precision and reliability of estimates of the association between preoperative serum albumin concentration and surgical outcomes.Design: Prospective observational study. Patients were followed up for 30 days postoperatively. Multiple logistic regression models were developed to evaluate serum albumin level as a predictor of operative mortality and morbidity in relation to 61 other preoperative patient risk variables.Setting: Forty-four tertiary care Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers.Patients: A total of 54 215 major noncardiac surgery cases from the National VA Surgical Risk Study.Main Outcome Measures: Thirty-day operative mortality and morbidity.Results: A decrease in serum albumin from concentrations greater than 46 g/L to less than 21 g/L was associated with an exponential increase in mortality rates from less than 1% to 29% and in morbidity rates from 10% to 65%. In the regression models, albumin level was the strongest predictor of mortality and morbidity for surgery as a whole and within several subspecialties selected for further analysis. Albumin level was a better predictor of some types of morbidity, particularly sepsis and major infections, than other types.Conclusions: Serum albumin concentration is a better predictor of surgical outcomes than many other preoperative patient characteristics. It is a relatively low-cost test that should be used more frequently as a prognostic tool to detect malnutrition and risk of adverse surgical outcomes, particularly in populations in whom comorbid conditions are relatively frequent.
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a preoperative risk index for predicting postoperative respiratory failure (PRF).
Summary Background DataRespiratory failure is an important postoperative complication.
MethodBased on a prospective cohort study, cases from 44 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (n ϭ 81,719) were used to develop the models. Cases from 132 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (n ϭ 99,390) were used as a validation sample. PRF was defined as mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours after surgery or reintubation and mechanical ventilation after postoperative extubation. Ventilator-dependent, comatose, do not resuscitate, and female patients were excluded.
ResultsPRF developed in 2,746 patients (3.4%). The respiratory failure risk index was developed from a simplified logistic regression model and included abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, upper abdominal surgery, peripheral vascular surgery, neck surgery, emergency surgery, albumin level less than 30 g/L, blood urea nitrogen level more than 30 mg/dL, dependent functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and age.
ConclusionsThe respiratory failure risk index is a validated model for identifying patients at risk for developing PRF and may be useful for guiding perioperative respiratory care.Postoperative pulmonary complications greatly contribute to the death and complication rates of surgery. It has been reported that 5% to 10% of all surgical patients and 9% to 40% of those undergoing abdominal surgery experience postoperative pulmonary complications.
The postoperative pneumonia risk index identifies patients at risk for postoperative pneumonia and may be useful in guiding perioperative respiratory care.
A substantial minority of patients aged 80 and older died or suffered a complication within 30 days of surgery, but for many operations mortality rates were extremely low. Postoperative complications were associated with high 30-day mortality in patients aged 80 and older.
Mortality rates after colectomy in Veterans Affairs hospitals are comparable with those reported in other large studies. Ascites, hypernatremia, do not resuscitate status before surgery, and American Society of Anesthesiologists classes III and IV OR V were strongly predictive of perioperative death. Clinical trials to decrease the complication rate after colectomy for colon cancer should focus on these risk factors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based startup that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.