We examine the association between borrower (firm) and lender (bank) state ownership and accounting
conservatism for a sample of Chinese firms. We hypothesize that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) adopt less
conservative accounting than non-state-owned enterprises (NSOEs) because lenders are less concerned with
downside risk for SOEs than for NSOEs. We also hypothesize a negative relation between conservatism and the
fraction of total loans a firm borrows from state-owned banks (SBs) because SBs have weaker demand for assurance
of sufficient net assets to cover loan repayments than non-state-owned banks (NSBs). We find support for both
hypotheses. Further analyses reveal that: (1) firms that borrow from commercial SBs exhibit more conservative
accounting than firms that borrow from policy SBs and (2) firms adopt more conservative accounting as they get
more loans from banks with foreign ownership or exclusively foreign banks. However, the results of these additional
analyses are to some extent sensitive to alternative measures of accounting conservatism
We hypothesize that if individual auditors possess unique audit styles that they consistently apply to different audit engagements, then client firms with a common signing auditor will exhibit higher earnings comparability. Using a large sample of Chinese firms, we find that client firms report more comparable earnings when they are audited by the same individual auditor than when they are audited by (1) different audit firms, (2) the same audit firm, but different audit offices, and (3) the same audit office, but different individual auditors. The individual auditor style effect is stronger for larger audit firms, senior signing auditors, and signing auditors with more stable teamwork experience. We also document that having a common signing auditor is associated with lower analyst earnings forecast error and dispersion for client firms. This study contributes to the literature by showing that individual auditors have a significant impact on client firms' earnings comparability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.