No abstract
According to that old story, a local giving directions to a lost traveler says, "If I wanted to get there, I wouldn't start from here." Medicine finds itself far from the bedside, 1,2 seeking a way back, unsure where to begin.That we have wandered far afield is plain to see. Core bedside skills of history taking and physical examinationstill vital to comprehensive assessment, diagnostic accuracy, 3 and truly patient-focused care-are taught and assessed in the first two years of medical school but largely ignored once the student reaches the clinical years. 4 During residency, development of these skills is assumed when in fact they wither further. 5 The physical examination of newly admitted patients is often cursory and, what is worse, perverted by drop-down boxes into an exaggerated and invented form that reads better than the truth.Technology drives diagnosis, but it often merely substitutes our fears of uncertainty with delusions of certainty. We seem increasingly chained to the computer, providing perfect care to our virtual patient, the iPatient. 2 More has seemed better than less for so long that we now need a national campaign 6 to alert our patients to "Just Say No" and save themselves from the hazards and costs of diagnostic misadventure. While we all agonize over the spiraling costs of a "Hi-Tech, Lo-Think" approach, many stand to gain from its persistence.But we have to start somewhere. The way physicians are taught is fundamental to the type of health care they deliver. The road back to the bedside will, we believe, start at the bedside, in the way that clinical skills are taught and assessed.We in the United States stand out among other major Western health care professionals in having a summative postgraduate medical certification process that is entirely dependent on the assessment of knowledge. Elsewhere, for example, the United Kingdom, internal medicine trainees must additionally pass a clinical skills assessment in which independent faculty-level examiners directly observe resident-level trainees assessing real patients. 7 In the States, no high-stakes clinical skills assessment for the purpose of certification in internal medicine has survived. The USMLE Step 2 CS is for many trainees the last time that their clinical skills are objectively assessed, and it ensures that a basic level of competence is attained. But given its current content and standard, it cannot equip internal medicine trainees for future practice and appears to mark an end, not a beginning. Meanwhile, high scores on tests of knowledge directly translate into better career prospects. If "assessment does indeed drive learning," 8 we should not be surprised if our trainees prefer books to the bedside.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.