ABSTRACT1. Long-term and well-managed marine protected areas (MPAs) can, under the right circumstances, contribute to biodiversity conservation and fisheries management, thus contributing to food security and sustainable livelihoods.2. This article emphasizes (1) the potential utility of MPAs as a fisheries management tool, (2) the costs and benefits of MPAs for fishing communities, and (3) the foundations of good governance and management processes for creating effective MPAs with a dual fisheries and conservation mandate.3. This article highlights case studies from numerous regions of the world that demonstrate practical and often successful solutions in bridging the divide between MPA management and fisheries sustainability, with a focus on small-scale coastal fisheries in order to emphasize lessons learned.4. To be an effective fisheries management tool, MPAs should be embedded in broader fisheries management and conservation plans. MPAs are unlikely to generate benefits if implemented in isolation. The spatial and temporal distribution of benefits and costs needs to be taken into account since proximal fishery-dependent communities may experience higher fishing costs over the short and long-term while the fisheries benefits from MPAs may only accrue over the long-term.5. Key lessons for effectively bridging the divide between biodiversity conservation and fisheries sustainability goals in the context of MPAs include: creating spaces and processes for engagement, incorporating fisheries in MPA design and MPAs into fisheries management, engaging fishers in management, recognizing rights and tenure, coordinating between agencies and clarifying roles, combining no-take-areas with other fisheries management actions, addressing the balance of costs and benefits to fishers, making a long-term commitment, creating a collaborative network of stakeholders, taking multiple pressures into account, managing adaptively, recognizing and addressing trade-offs, and matching good governance with effective management and enforcement.
-Results of an annual survey of fishing activities and catches in the Gambia estuary (200 km long), carried out from June 2001 to May 2002, indicated that fishing effort targets mainly (66% of fishing trips) shrimps. As a result of the globalisation of fish markets, the fishery has become a quasi mono-exploitation of shrimp for exporting. At the opposite, fishing activities focusing on fish were low and carried out with large and medium mesh drift nets, gill nets and surrounding nets (17% of fishing trips), handlines and longlines (15%). The annual catch, estimated at 2350 tonnes for the estuarine part of the River Gambia, consisted of 1800 t of fish and 550 t of shrimp. Stownets were the most efficient gear accounting for 50% of the total production (550 t of shrimp and 600 t of fish) while other significant techniques were mainly drift nets (21%), longlines (11%) and gillnets (5%). Fish catches were composed with 55 fish species among which 16 species accounted for 90% of the annual catch. The average catch length of these first sixteen species was 295 mm, clearly demonstrating that fishing for fish was targeting large fish. The effects of the targeted shrimp exploitation resulted in a low fishing effort for fish leading to low fish landings and consequently to an under exploitation of fish resource in the Gambia estuary.Key words: Artisanal fisheries / Gambia estuary / Fish statistics / Finfish / Shrimp / Mono-exploitation Résumé -Impacts d'une exploitation spécialisée de la crevette (Penaeus notialis)s u rl e sc a p t u r e sd ep o i s s o n dans l'estuaire de la Gambie. Les résultats d'un suivi annuel des activités de pêche et des captures dans l'estuaire de la Gambie (200 km de long), mené de juin 2001 à mai 2002, montrent que l'effort de pêche était principalement concentré sur l'exploitation de la crevette (66 % des sorties de pêche). Suite à la mondialisation des marchés, la pêcherie a évolué vers une quasi mono exploitation de la crevette, les produits étant destinés à l'exportation. A l'inverse, les activités ciblant le poisson étaient faibles et menées à l'aide de filets dérivants, dormants ou encerclants à larges ou moyennes mailles (17 % des sorties de pêche), de lignes à main et de palangres (15 %). Les captures annuelles, estimées à 2350 tonnes pour la partie estuarienne du fleuve Gambie, comprenaient 1800 t de poisson et 550 t de crevette. Les filets à crevettes étaient les plus efficaces capturant 50 % de la production totale (550 t de crevette et 600 t de poisson). Les autres engins intervenant significativement dans les captures étaient principalement les filets dérivants (21 %), les palangres (11 %) et les filets dormants (5 %). Les prises de poisson étaient composées de 55 espèces parmi lesquelles les seize premières représentaient 90 % des captures annuelles. La moyenne des tailles de capture de ces seize espèces était élevée (295 mm), indiquant clairement que l'effort de pêche se concentrait sur des espèces et/ou individus de grande taille. Les conséquences de la forte spécialisa...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.