Mahe, K., Amara, R., Bryckaert, T., Kacher, M., and Brylinski, J. M. 2007. Ontogenetic and spatial variation in the diet of hake (Merluccius merluccius) in the Bay of Biscay and the Celtic Sea. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 1210–1219. Analysis of the diet of trawl-caught hake (Merluccius merluccius) from three locations in the Bay of Biscay and the Celtic Sea in autumn 2001 showed that small hake fed almost exclusively on crustaceans (mainly euphausiids), but that there was a significant shift towards a fully piscivorous diet in hake >23 cm. A change in fish prey was also size-dependent, because smaller hake (<30 cm) preyed on small pelagic fish (3–12 cm), such as horse mackerel, anchovy, and pilchard, and larger hake on larger demersal prey (12–23 cm), such as blue whiting. There was a significant positive relationship between hake and fish prey length. In terms of fish prey selectivity, hake exhibited particular preference for small pelagic prey (anchovy, pilchard, and argentine) and for other hake. The diet did not generally reflect fish prey availability. Although horse mackerel and blue whiting were the two most abundant fish prey species in the environment, they were not positively selected by hake. Cannibalism accounted for a non-negligible part of the diet and was observed mainly in large hake (>30 cm). For all sizes analysed, conspecifics constituted 19.2%W of the diet and the frequency of occurrence of hake in the stomachs was 10.53%. Most hake prey were 0-group juveniles (<20 cm). Hake cannibalism appeared to be influenced mainly by the abundance of juveniles and the overlap between distribution patterns of juveniles and adults.

No abstract

The nematode Anguillicoloides crassus is one of the many threats hanging over anguillid eels, now known to infect six Anguilla species worldwide. It was first described in Japan, in 1974, and is commonly thought to natively stem from East Asia. Here our primary objective was to critically evaluate this long-held statement. We first retraced the factual history of this global invader, to later investigate the pros and cons for an East Asian origin. After exploring the alternative scenarios for the joint origin of the two anguillicolid parasites occurring in this area, we concluded that the geographic zone covering the natural range of the local eel A. japonica is still the most probable origin (in the absence of another identified candidate host and area). However, we cannot exclude that A. crassus may have been previously introduced along with exotic eel species, at some early stages of aquaculture in Japan. We call for caution when dealing with the native origin of this and other parasitic invaders in provenance of East Asia, a region to be regarded as a major crossroads for fish and parasites of the world. We finally identified the need for a possible resolution of the question, which includes a deeper sampling effort in the Indo-Pacific zone and the further development of molecular phylogeographic studies of all five anguillicolid species and their hosts.

No abstract