Intra-arterial injection of radioactive Lipiodol has shown promising results in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal obstruction. The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with HCC. From September 1990 to September 1993, 142 patients (135 men, 7 women; age: 65 +/- 6.6 years) were randomly assigned to treatment groups and given either intra-arterial injections of 131I-labeled Lipiodol (60 mCi; 2.2 GBq) (n = 73) or chemoembolization (70 mg cisplatin) (n = 69). Subsequent injections were given at 2, 5, 8, 12, and 18 months. Tumor response was assessed on the basis of tumor size and serum alpha-fetoprotein levels. Patient tolerance was assessed clinically and angiographically. Survival rate was the main end-point. A total of 129 patients (65 in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol group and 64 in the chemoembolization group) were available for analysis; 13 were excluded, mainly because of portal vein thrombosis. The two groups were comparable. Actuarial survival curves were not significantly different between the two groups. Overall survival rates at 6 months, 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 69%, 38%, 22%, 14%, and 10%, and 66%, 42%, 22%, 3%, and 0% in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization groups, respectively. Reduction in tumor size was similar for the two groups, with complete response in 1 and 0 patients and partial response in 15 and 16 patients in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization groups, respectively. Tolerance was significantly better in the 131I-labeled Lipiodol group both clinically (3 severe side effects vs. 29 in the chemoembolization group; P < .001) and angiographically (1 arterial thrombosis vs. 10 in the chemoembolization group; P < .01). In terms of patient survival and tumor response, radioactive 131I-labeled Lipiodol and chemoembolization were equally effective in the treatment of HCC, but tolerance to 131I-labeled Lipiodol was significantly better.

Background and Purpose-To replace digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in carotid stenosis evaluation, noninvasive imaging techniques have to reach a high concordance rate. Our purpose is to compare the concordance rates of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) and CT angiography (CTA) with Doppler ultrasound (DUS) in clinical routine practice. Methods-We evaluated prospectively with DUS, CEMRA, and CTA 150 patients suspected of carotid stenosis. The overall concordance rates of the 3 techniques were calculated for symptomatic stenosis Ն50% and Ն70%, for asymptomatic stenosis Ն60%, and for occlusion. For the carotid arteries treated by surgery (nϭ97), the results of each method and combined techniques were recorded, and misclassification rates were evaluated from surgical reports. Results-The overall concordance rates of DUS-CEMRA, DUS-CTA, and CEMRA-CTA were not statistically different.However, the concordance rate of DUS-CEMRA (92.53%) was significantly higher than that for DUS-CTA (79.10%) in the surgical asymptomatic stenosis group (Pϭ0.0258). CTA considered alone would misclassify the stenosis in a significant number of cases (11 of 64) in the surgical asymptomatic group compared with CEMRA (3 of 67) and DUS (1 of 66) (Pϭ0.0186 versus MRA, Pϭ0.0020 versus DUS). Conclusions-With the techniques as utilized in our study, the overall concordance rates of combined noninvasive methods are similar for measuring carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice, but in asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the decision making for surgery is significantly altered if DUS and CTA are considered in place of DUS and CEMRA.

We set out to assess the influence of a teleradiology network on the relations between a general hospital and a 100 km distant university hospital in the context of neurosurgical emergencies, and compared a commercially available technology, N-ISDN (Narrowband Integrated Service/Digital Network), to an emerging technology, ATM (Asynchronous Transfer Mode). The evaluation was conducted using records of advice request calls and patient transfers. Three phases were considered: without teleradiology, with transfer of digitized images over N-ISDN at 64 kbps, and with an experimental ATM network at 10.5 Mbps with DICOM image transfers and videoconferencing. Additionally, staff meetings over ATM videoconferencing were set up. To assess the ATM service, we used log files and questionnaires, 108 advice requests were studied over a 18 month period. The average transmission time for one examination was 38 s with full DICOM image resolution over ATM, versus 150 s with 10:1 JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) compression over N-ISDN. Up to 50% unnecessary patient transfers were avoided. Advice requests increased fourfold, and non-urgent advice requests increased from 0 to 21%. Despite the experimental configuration of the ATM network, the service gave satisfaction to all the physicians. Videoconferencing was unanimously regarded as a prominent tool to improve the quality of interaction. It was particularly useful for non-urgent cases and distant staff meetings. Teleradiology can improve the relations between hospitals through an increase of urgent and non-urgent advice requests. Asynchronous transfer mode is an efficient way for fast transfer of radiological examinations in DICOM format and for discussing them through high-quality videoconferencing.

In this study, the young age of the patients and their aortic neck quality, in particular the absence of neck calcification, appear to have been the main factors affecting aneurysm shrinkage, such that they represent a target population for the improvement of EVAR results.