Background. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication following liver transplantation and carries a poor prognosis with mortality approaching 90 -95%. Diagnosis of GVHD is often delayed due to early symptoms mimicking more common, entities such as drug reactions and viral syndromes. To date, definitive diagnosis has been difficult and has relied on a constellation of clinical and histopathologic variables. We present the use of short tandem repeat DNA "fingerprinting" technology as a method of early, definitive diagnosis of GVHD in patients after liver transplantation. Methods. A patient status-postorthotopic cadaveric-liver transplant, with an uncomplicated immediate posttransplant course, presented 4 weeks after transplant with fever, diarrhea, and maculopapular rash on her palms, soles, and back. The patient's condition worsened despite empiric treatment for an infectious etiology. Skin and rectal biopsies were suspicious for GVHD. Results. DNA was isolated from the skin and rectal biopsies as well as from a donor lymph node. PCR amplification was done for nine highly polymorphic short tandem repeats for each specimen and a unique DNA "fingerprint" was obtained from each. DNA from skin and rectum demonstrated mixed chimerism with both donor and recipient alleles detected. Thorough analysis confirmed GVHD. Conclusion. Short tandem repeats for DNA fingerprinting represents an efficient and reproducible method for the definitive diagnosis of GVHD after liver transplantation. Rapid detection of GVHD using this technology, coupled with early initiation of therapy, may lead to improved survival for patients with GVHD after solid organ transplant.
INTRODUCTION
Group AB plasma, the traditional universal donor plasma product, is a limited resource. We compared outcomes of Group A plasma transfusion in comparison to AB.
METHODS
Analysis of blunt-injured patients who received emergency release plasma from was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify associations with morbidity and mortality.
RESULTS
There were 191 patients; 115 Group A and 76 Group AB. No differences were seen in age, sex, plasma transfusions, uncrossmatched red blood cells (RBCs), and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Patients who received Group A plasma had significantly lower Injury Severity Score, chest Abbreviated Injury Scale, and scene transfer rate but not head AIS, or abdomen AIS. In addition, significant differences were noted in terms of blood products transfused within 24 hours in those receiving Group A over AB. Development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but not mortality, was higher within the AB cohort. No hemolytic or transfusion associated-ARDS reactions were noted in either group. ARDS; RBC transfusion volumes and head AIS were independently associated with mortality.
CONCLUSION
Utilization of Group A plasma for emergency blood resuscitation is a safe option which may alleviate potential shortages of AB plasma.
Preoperative opioid use is associated with greater resource utilization after emergency general surgery, as well as vastly different postoperative opioid prescription patterns. These findings may help to inform the impact of preoperative opioid use on patient care, and its implications on hospital and societal cost.
MERT-E is a high value asset which makes an important contribution to patient care. A relatively small proportion of missions require interventions beyond the capability of well-trained military paramedics; the indirect benefits of a physician are more difficult to quantify.
Military surgeons should be aware of the phenomenon of indirect injury to the colon after high-energy transfer GSW and blast injury. A high index of suspicion should be maintained and cross-sectional imaging used where feasible. Primary colonic reconstruction was used safely in these patients with indirect colonic injuries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.