Purpose:To quantify the activity profiles of elite wheelchair rugby (WCR) players and establish classification-specific arbitrary speed zones. In addition, indicators of fatigue during full matches were explored.Methods:Seventy-five elite WCR players from 11 national teams were monitored using a radio-frequency-based, indoor tracking system across 2 international tournaments. Players who participated in complete quarters (n = 75) and full matches (n = 25) were included and grouped by their International Wheelchair Rugby Federation functional classification: groups I (0.5), II (1.0–1.5), III (2.0–2.5), and IV (3.0–3.5).Results:During a typical quarter, significant increases in total distance (m), relative distance (m/min), and mean speed (m/s) were associated with an increase in classification group (P < .001), with the exception of groups III and IV. However, group IV players achieved significantly higher peak speeds (3.82 ± 0.31 m/s) than groups I (2.99 ± 0.28 m/s), II (3.44 ± 0.26 m/s), and III (3.67 ± 0.32 m/s). Groups I and II differed significantly in match intensity during very-low/low-speed zones and the number of high-intensity activities in comparison with groups III and IV (P < .001). Full-match analysis revealed that activity profiles did not differ significantly between quarters.Conclusions:Notable differences in the volume of activity were displayed across the functional classification groups. However, the specific on-court requirements of defensive (I and II) and offensive (III and IV) match roles appeared to influence the intensity of match activities, and consequently training prescription should be structured accordingly.
• This is the version of the paper as accepted for publica- The aim of the current study was to establish which indicators of mobility are associated with 2 successful wheelchair rugby performance and determine whether these indicators differed 3 across classification. Data were collected from 11 international teams during 30 matches (353 4 match observations) using a radio-frequency based, indoor tracking system across two 5 tournaments. Players (n = 111) were first grouped by team rank as determined by their 6International Wheelchair Rugby Federation (IWRF) world ranking (LOW, MID, HIGH) and 7 then into one of four groups based on their IWRF classification: group I (0.5), II (1.0-1.5), III 8 (2.0-2.5), IV (3.0-3.5). The volume of activity (relative distance and mean speed), peak speed, 9and time spent within classification-specific arbitrary speed zones were calculated for each 10 individual. Although no differences were identified in the volume of activity, playing time 11 was significantly reduced in LOW (34:51 ± 8:35) compared to MID (48:54 ± 0:51) and 12 HIGH (45:38 ± 9:53), which was further supported by the greater number of substitutions 13 performed by LOW. HIGH achieved greater peak speeds (3.55 ± 0.40 m·sˉ¹) than LOW (3.27 14 ± 0.42 m·sˉ¹) and MID (3.45 ± 0.41 m·sˉ¹). Peak speed was further shown to be 15 classification-dependent (P ≤ 0.005), whereby HIGH groups III and IV players achieved 16 greater peak speeds than LOW and MID. The time spent performing high-intensity activities 17 was also greater in HIGH compared to LOW and MID, whilst further influenced by 18 classification (P ≤ 0.0005). To conclude, peak speed and the ability to perform a greater 19 number of high-intensity activities were associated with successful performance in 20 wheelchair rugby. 21
Aim: The quantification and longitudinal monitoring of athlete training load (TL) provides a scientific explanation for changes in performance and helps manage injury/illness risk. Therefore, accurate and reliable monitoring tools are essential for the optimization of athletic performance. The aim of the present study was to establish the relationship between measures of internal [heart rate (HR) and session RPE (sRPE)] and external TL specific to wheelchair rugby (WR).Methods: Fourteen international WR athletes (age = 29 ± 7 years; body mass = 58.9 ± 10.9 kg) were monitored during 18 training sessions over a 3 month period during the competitive phase of the season. Activity profiles were collected during each training session using a radio-frequency based indoor tracking system (ITS). External TL was quantified by total distance (m) covered as well as time spent and distance covered in a range of classification-specific arbitrary speed zones. Banister's TRIMP, Edwards's summated HR zone (SHRZ), and Lucia's TRIMP methods were used to quantify physiological internal TL. sRPE was calculated as the product of session duration multiplied by perceived exertion using the Borg CR10 scale. Relationships between external and internal TL were examined using correlation coefficients and the 90% confidence intervals (90% CI).Results: sRPE (r = 0.59) and all HR-based (r > 0.80) methods showed large and very large relationships with the total distance covered during training sessions, respectively. Large and very large correlations (r = 0.56 − 0.82) were also observed between all measures of internal TL and times spent and distances covered in low and moderate intensity speed zones. HR-based methods showed very large relationships with time (r = 0.71−0.75) and distance (r = 0.70−0.73) in the very high speed zone and a large relationship with the number of high intensity activities (HIA) performed (r = 0.56−0.62). Weaker relationships (r = 0.32−0.35) were observed between sRPE and all measures of high intensity activity. A large variation of individual correlation co-efficient was observed between sRPE and all external TL measures.Conclusion: The current findings suggest that sRPE and HR-based internal TL measures provide a valid tool for quantifying volume of external TL during WR training but may underestimate HIA. It is recommended that both internal and external TL measures are employed for the monitoring of overall TL during court-based training in elite WR athletes.
The purpose of the current study was to determine the validity and reliability of a gyroscope 2 sensor for assessing speed specific to athletes competing in the wheelchair court sports
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.