Purpose: We evaluated the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer and predicting of surgical staging of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: The study was done in 110 subjects who got mpMRI before radical prostatectomy in our hospital from 2016 to 2019. Preoperative mpMRI findings of 110 were compared to surgical pathology results following radical Prostatectomy. A comparison was made between pathologic staging of prostate cancer and the mpMRI findings. Results: pathologic evaluation confirmed prostate cancer foci (237) were recognized in 110 subjects. Generally, mpMRI sensitivity of 46.4% was found for prostate cancer detection (110/237). Pathological tumor volume was a significant predictor of prostate cancer detection using mpMRI. In 33% of the cases, the pathologic staging is precisely similar to mpMRI and in 43%of the cases, there was a slight difference between the pathologic staging and staging by mpMRI but the cancer was confined to the prostate.in 24% of the cases, there was a significant difference between the pathologic staging and staging by mpMRI. The mpMRI was not able to identify the significant cancer in 24% of the cases. Conclusion: The preoperative mpMRI was useful in detecting prostate cancer and in predicting surgical staging. However, the detection of 24% of clinically significant cancer was missed using mpMRI. As we move toward personalized medicine, use of MRI to biopsy each man's prostate differently rather than based on a pre-defined 12 core seems to be supported in the recent literature.
Background: Given the popularity of prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing in recent years, the number of patients undergoing diagnostic prostate biopsy has increased. The transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) biopsy is considered as the gold standard for prostate cancer detection, although has a low sensitivity. Objectives: The current study aimed at enhancing prostate cancer diagnosis using MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with negative history of TRUS biopsy. Methods: In the current study, patients undergone TRUS prostate biopsy with benign results that were candidates for repeat biopsy were recruited. After making the preparations, patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion biopsy. Gleason score, the number of involved cores, perineural invasion, perilymphovascular invasion, and the percentage of core involvement were recorded. Results: Of the 191 patients, 70 (36.6%) had positive biopsies. The frequency of non-detectable cancers by targeted biopsy based on the level of cancer risk showed that at the very high-risk level, five (29.4%) and at high-risk level, two (11.7%) subjects were not recognized. The mean Gleason score in targeted (7.47 ± 0.99) and random (7.13 ± 1.04) positive biopsies showed a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.045). Targeted biopsies are better than random ones to detect high-risk (33.9% vs 29.2%, P = 0.013 respectively) and very high-risk cancers (45.3% vs. 41.5%, P = 0.05 respectively). Conclusions: The combination of both biopsy approaches is suggested to offer a reliable method with high rate of tumor detection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.