In this study, the monotonic and cyclic behavior of an offshore wind turbine with a monopile foundation installed in a sand layer were evaluated in the centrifuge. A simplified offshore wind turbine was modeled, and the lateral load was applied to the tower under displacement control. The monotonic loading test evaluated ultimate lateral load capacity and bending moment profiles under different loading levels. During cyclic loading, variations of moment-rotation responses, cyclic stiffness, and bending moments along the pile were observed. The initial rotational stiffness of the monopile decreased as the loading level increased. In the fatigue limit state (FLS) and service limit state (SLS) loading conditions, no noticeable variation in stiffness was observed with the number of cycles. However, in the ultimate limit state (ULS), the stiffness of the monopile increased during the first few cycles, followed by a decreasing rate of increase, and reached a certain value. The loading rate had a weakening effect on the monopile–soil interaction, which was supported by the bending moments induced in the monopile.
In recent, suction anchor foundations have been encouraged as an alternative for supporting offshore wind turbines in the deep sea. The foundation for offshore wind turbine foundation should be designed considering the cyclic forces, which cause an accumulated displacement of the structure and degradation of the stiffness of the ground-foundation system. However, previous researches for suction anchor behaviors have mostly focused on static loads, although the forces applying on the offshore structure are cyclic in the sea. Moreover, since the suction anchors are always subjected to sustained pullout loads combined with cyclic loading due to the buoyancy forces of the structure, evaluating the in-service performance of suction anchor foundations considering cyclic loadings with sustained pullout loads is also required. In this study, the responses of a suction anchor foundation under cyclic loading along with sustained pull-out loads were investigated via centrifuge model tests. Consequently, it was observed that the behavior of the suction anchor are dependent on the sustained pullout loads, as well as the cyclic loading. This study highlights that the ratio of sustained pull-out loads as well as the cyclic load effect must be considered when analyzing design loads to accurately evaluate the bearing resistance of the suction anchor foundation.
In this study, the cyclic responses of an offshore wind turbine with a tripod foundation installed on an actual site were evaluated in a centrifuge. To understand the behavior of the turbine at the site, the site soil conditions, environmental loads, and real offshore wind turbine structure installed at the actual site were modeled by considering the centrifuge scaling law. From a series of cyclic loading tests, the cyclic responses of the tripod foundation were evaluated in terms of temporary/permanent displacements and cyclic stiffness. Moreover, the long-term behavior of the tripod foundation was predicted from the experimental results. The test results showed that the initial stiffness of the soil–foundation system decreased as the loading amplitude increased and that the stiffness increased with the number of cycles due to soil densification. The findings revealed that the cyclic behaviors of the tripod were more affected by the load amplitude than the number of cycles. In addition, the permanent rotation increased logarithmically with the number of cycles. A simple method to predict the displacement and change in the foundation stiffness of the actual wind turbine is proposed based on the results of the model tests. The results of this study also provide key insights into the long-term cyclic behavior of tripod foundations for offshore wind turbines.
A monopile is the most conventional structure foundation for offshore wind turbines (OWTs) in the world. However, the Korean offshore wind industry has mostly been using the jacket type of foundation. The main reason for the current situation in Korea is that most of the marine soil consists of weak layers of sand and clay. Thus, the monopile foundation depth has to be deep enough to satisfy the intended serviceability design requirement of the monopile and the rotation limit at the seabed; a conventional monopile design concept alone might be insufficient in Korean offshore conditions, or otherwise could be very expensive, e.g., resulting in a rock socket installation at the tip of the monopile. The main objective of this paper is to introduce a novel hybrid monopile that is composed of a monopile and a supplemental support with three buckets, followed by assessing the lateral resistance of the hybrid system through physical experiments and finite element (FE) simulations. Namely, 1/64.5 small-scaled monopile and hybrid physical models with a monopile diameter of 7 m for a 5.5 MW OWT were loaded monotonically. The results show that the hybrid monopile improves the lateral bearing capacity regarding the initial lateral stiffness and ultimate load. The FE analyses of the corresponding physical models were also implemented to support the results from the physical model test. The numerical results, such as the structural member forces and soil deformation, were analyzed in detail. Additionally, a case study using FE analysis was conducted for the 5.5 MW OWT hybrid monopile support installed in a representative Korean weak soil area. The results show that the hybrid monopile foundation has a larger lateral resistance and stiffness than the monopile.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.