Objective: To analyze the content of the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge in individuals with heart failure. Methods: Methodological study to validate the content of a nursing diagnosis based on the predictive model of diversity, carried out through the organization of the phenomenon of interest and analysis by judges using the collective wisdom model. The NANDA-I Knowledge Deficient diagnosis was evaluated by 48 judges and considered valid when it presented a median content validity index ≥ 0.8 in the confidence intervals.Results: Note that 66.6% of the judges indicated that the new definition proposed was more adequate than the definition adopted by NANDA-I. After the experts' analysis, the following defining characteristics were considered valid: inaccurate statements about the disease and/or therapy, inadequate performance in the management of intercurrences, increase in hospital readmissions, worsened quality of life, deficit in self-care performance, and follow-up of inadequate instruction; related factors are as follows: inadequate guidance offered by health professionals, nonparticipation of the patient in the planning of their health care, weakened relationship between professional and individual; populations at risk-elderly and low level of education of the individual and/or caregiver and the associated condition, mild cognitive impairment. Anxiety, depression, and impaired social interaction were elements considered not relevant to the content domain. Conclusion: The validation of the content of the aforementioned diagnosis in patients with heart failure, through the analysis of judges with different degrees of expertise, made it possible to improve the definition and expansion of new diagnostic indicators. Implications for nursing practice: Updated diagnostic elements for the nursing diagnosis deficient knowledge in individuals with heart failure will facilitate accurate clinical judgment and the establishment of a therapeutic plan aimed at etiological factors modifiable by nurses.
Objetivo: Elaborar e realizar a validação de face e conteúdo da Escala de Avaliação do Conhecimento de Pacientes acerca da Cirurgia Cardíaca(EACCC). Método: Trata-se de um estudo metodológico, quantitativo, em que participaram 30 enfermeiros considerados expertos pelos critérios propostospor Fehring. Resultados: Os respondentes eram em sua maioria mulheres (24; 80,0%), com tempo médio de formação de 5,5±10,43 anos e tempode experiência aproximado ao de formação (5,0±10,78). Não houve sugestão para alteração na forma de avaliar as respostas em cada item e pontuá-las,sendo realizadas alterações para a redação ou o conteúdo de itens, conforme sugestões. Conclusão: A versão final permaneceu com a mesma quantidadede itens da versão primeira. De forma geral, na avaliação dos juízes, a escala apresentou-se útil para o alcance do seu objetivo, estando pronta paraa validação clínica.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.