To the best of our knowledge, this is the first class I study on the efficacy of the GLM in the treatment of LC-BPPV in both geotropic and apogeotropic forms. GLM proved highly effective compared to the sham maneuver (P < 0.0001). The present class I study of the efficacy of the GLM changes the level of recommendation of the method for treating LC-BPPV from level U to level B for the geotropic variant and from level B to level A for the apogeotropic variant of LC-BPPV.
Elevated leptin levels are not determined by obesity alone, since they decreased with Apnea Hypopnea Index reduction. Higher pro-inflammatory cytokine basal levels observed in patients with OSAS were not correlated with BMI.
The aim of this study was to assess the natural course of positional down-beating nystagmus (pDBN) and vertigo in patients with no evidence of central nervous system involvement and of presumed peripheral origin. Fifty-three patients with pDBN had a complete otoneurological examination. All subjects, apart from three (excluded from the study), showed no additional neurological signs and normal brain imaging. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: with or without treatment with exercise. Patients were seen again after 24 h, and then weekly for up to 6 months. Forty-seven patients (94%) showed pDBN in the straight head-hanging position and in a Dix-Hallpike position. A torsional component was detected in 17 patients (34%). The mean latency and duration of pDBN was 4.7 ± 5 s and 40.1 ± 22 s, respectively. After 2 weeks, only 12 patients (24%) still had pDBN and all but one patient had recovered by 1 month. Twenty patients (40%) were diagnosed with a typical posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (PC BPPV) before or after pDBN. This study assessed for the first time the natural course of presumed peripheral pDBN, which was characterized by a spontaneous remission in 24 patients in the first week and in 49 patients within 4 weeks. pDBN is much more common than previously suggested, with about the same frequency as lateral canal BPPV. Furthermore, the clinical characteristics of pDBN have been highlighted, as well as its possible relationship to PC BPPV.
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a very prevalent inflammatory disease. Treatments vary in different countries. In the present study, we explored the approaches of physicians in 50 countries. In this cross-sectional study, a rhinosinusitis survey (RSS) was completed by Honorary and Corresponding Members (otorhinolaryngologists) of the Italian Society of Rhinology. In 79.1 % of the 50 countries, the proportion of patients suffering from CRS was 15 %. Nasal symptoms were more intense in winter (46 % of countries), and spring and autumn (22 %). The most common symptoms were nasal obstruction (86 %), postnasal drip (82 %) and headache (52 %). The most common investigative modalities in the assessment of CRS are paranasal sinus CT, fiberoptic endoscopy, and anterior rhinoscopy. CRS patients were principally treated by otorhinolaryngologists (70 %). Medical treatments included nasal corticosteroids (90 %), nasal washes (68 %), and nasal decongestants (32 %). In 88 % of countries, more than 50 %, or "about 50 %", of all patients reported subjective symptom improvement after treatment. In most of the countries, surgery was required by 20-35 % of all CRS patients. During post-surgery follow-up, nasal washes (90 %), nasal corticosteroids (76 %), and systemic antibiotics (32 %) were prescribed. In 20-40 % of all patients, CRS was associated with nasal polyps. In such patients, the medical treatment options were nasal corticosteroids (90 %), systemic corticosteroids (50 %), nasal washes (46 %), and systemic antibiotics (34 %). Treatment of CRS patients varies in different countries. Paranasal sinus CT is the most common investigative modality in the assessment of CRS, and nasal corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, in the absence or presence of nasal polyps.
Background: Many patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) have multiple obstructive sites simultaneously such as the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. Multilevel surgery is starting to be widely performed by ENT surgeons and accepted by patients.Methods: Twenty consecutive patients with moderate or severe OSAS were treated with single-stage multilevel surgery. They underwent transoral robotic surgery for tongue base reduction or epiglottoplasty, expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty, and septoplasty. Results:The average length of hospitalization was 5.2 ± 0.9 days. No serious complications were observed. At the postoperative control with polysomnography, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) had decreased by at least 50% in 90% of patients;improvements were observed in all sleep parameters. Conclusion:Single-stage multilevel surgery has proven to be effective in treating patients with moderate to severe OSAS, without experiencing persistent complaints.Despite multiple levels of obstruction being operated in a single stage, airway safety was maintained in all patients. K E Y W O R D S expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty, multilevel surgery, OSAS, TORS 1 | INTRODUCTION Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is characterized by recurring events of partial or complete upper airway collapse during sleep.It is related to increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and causes daytime sleepiness altering the quality of life. To eliminate the collapsing points in the airway, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-choice treatment and the first option that is recommended to the patient. Nevertheless, a significant number of patients refuse CPAP treatment, and in this case, surgical treatment becomes an alternative along with weight loss, orthodontic, and positional therapy.Most OSAS patients have multilevel obstructions at sites including the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx, so the best surgical management must be multilevel. 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.