Aims The aim of this study was to compare the effects of aspirin on platelet function as measured by the 'classical' template bleeding time with a new ex vivo method measuring closure times using the PFA-100@ machine. Platelet aggregation in response to arachidonic acid was also measured ex vivo. Methods The trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design, with each volunteer taking 750 mg aspirin (BP) or placebo, three times a day for 5 days, with an 18 day wash-out period between treatments. Bleeding times and closure times were measured before the first dose on the first day and 0.5 h after the last dose on the fifth day of each treatment period. They were also measured 2 weeks after the last day of the trial. Results Baseline bleeding times ( pre-placebo) were 415 s using the Simplate, whilst baseline closure times were 115 s using the PFA-100@. Aspirin treatment caused an increase of both the template bleeding time (61%) and the closure time of the PFA-100@ (79%) when compared with the effects of placebo. The platelet aggregatory response to arachidonic acid was completely inhibited following aspirin treatment and was unaffected following placebo. Two weeks after the end of the trial, all values had returned to pre-treatment levels. The template bleeding time was unaltered in 1 of the 12 volunteers during aspirin treatment and was significantly prolonged in 3 of the 12 volunteers during placebo treatment. The PFA-100@ closure time was unaltered in 1 of the 12 volunteers during aspirin treatment and was prolonged in 1 subject during placebo treatment. Conclusions The change in closure time using the PFA-100@ is as sensitive and reproducible to the effects of aspirin on platelet function as is the template bleeding time test. However, the PFA-100@ produced less variable effects with fewer false positive results.
Easily accessible normal tissues expressing the same molecular site(s) of drug action as malignant tissue offer an enhanced potential for early proof of anticancer drug mechanism and estimation of the biologically effective dose. Studies were undertaken in healthy male volunteers to assess the tolerability of single and multiple (four in 24 h) 3 mm punch biopsies of the buccal mucosa, and to determine the feasibility of detecting and quantifying a range of proliferation, cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis markers by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for use as potential pharmacodynamic (PD) end points. The biopsy procedure was well tolerated with 100% of volunteers stating that they would undergo single (n ¼ 10) and multiple (n ¼ 12) biopsies again. Total retinoblastoma protein (pRb), phosphorylated pRb (phospho-pRb), total p27, phosphorylated p27 (phospho-p27), phosphorylated-histone H3 (phospho-HH3), p21, p53, Cyclin A, Cyclin E, Ki67 all produced good signal detection, but M30, cleaved caspase 3 and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labelling did not. Total pRb, phospho-pRb, total p27 and phospho-p27 were quantified further in a multiple biopsy study to allow components of variability to be addressed to inform future sizing decisions on intervention studies. Neither site of biopsy within the oral cavity, nor the nominal time of biopsy had any significant impact on any of the four markers expression levels. Inter-and intrasubject coefficients of variation (CVs) that could be used to size future intervention studies for pRb, phospho-pRb, total p27 and phospho-p27 were 14, 19, 18 and 16%; and 18, 29, 25 and 19%, respectively. In conclusion, quantitation of such markers in 3 mm buccal punch biopsies would be suitable to explore as PD end points within intervention studies of drugs acting on these pathways.
scite is a Brooklyn-based startup that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.