One in six ocular firework traumas show severe vision loss, mostly in young males. Bystanders are as frequently injured. Firework traumas are a preventable cause of severe ocular injury and blindness because countries using restrictive firework legislation have remarkable lower trauma incidence rates.

Purpose To obtain the first representative and valid population-based prevalence figures on visual impairment and blindness in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) and to identify risk groups. Methods Study design: Cross-sectional survey. An age-Down's syndrome-stratified random sample of 1598 persons from a base population of 9012 adult users of ID services with mild to profound intellectual disabilities was screened. Participants underwent protocollised on-site screening of visual functions. Results were related to degree of ID, occurrence of Down's syndrome (DS) and age. Main outcome measure: Prevalences of visual impairment and blindness in the study population and in subgroups and weighted prevalences in the total Dutch population using ID services. Results Prevalences of visual impairment ranged from 2.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.5-6.4) in young adults with mild ID and no Down's syndrome to 66.7% (95% CI, 41.0-86.7) in older adults with profound ID and Down's syndrome; prevalences of blindness ranged from 0.7% (95% CI, 0.1-4.1) to 38.9% (95% CI, 28.1-50.3). Weighted prevalences of visual impairment and blindness in the total Dutch population of adult users of intellectual disabity services are 13.8% (95% CI, 9.3-18.4) and 5.0% (95% CI, 3.8-6.2), respectively. Prior to this study, visual impairment or blindness had remained undiagnosed in 106/261 (40.6%) persons.Conclusions As compared to published figures for the general Dutch population aged 55 years and over (visual impairment 1.4%, blindness 0.5%), prevalences of visual impairment and blindness are higher in all subgroups with intellectual disabilities, including the young and mildly handicapped group. The diagnosis is too often missed. All persons with severe or profound intellectual disabilities, and all older adults with Down's syndrome, should be considered visually impaired until proved otherwise.

Summary:Purpose: To describe concentric visual field loss found in the presurgical evaluation of patients with drugresistant temporal lobe epilepsy and relate the findings to potential causative factors.Methods: A series of 157 consecutive patients with drugresistant temporal lobe epilepsy, who had been selected for neurosurgical treatment, was examined in a study set up as a prospective investigation of their visual fields, to document the loss of visual field resulting from surgery. Pre-as well as postoperative visual field examinations were performed following a standard protocol using static and kinetic perimetry. As a number of patients appeared to have an unexplained concentric visual field contraction in the presurgical examination, a relation with potentially causative factors was analyzed in a crosssectional study of all these patients. Correlations were sought with duration and severity of the seizure disorder, underlying pathology as indicated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and demonstrated by pathology, any type of antiepileptic drug (AED) ever prescribed, and gender.Results: In this cross-sectoinal analysis of 157 consecutive patients who were candidates for surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy, absolute concentric contraction of the visual field of 10 to 30 degrees was found in the presurgical examination in 20 (17%) of 11 8 patients who had ever used vigabatrin (VGB) and in none of 39 who had not had this medication. This difference was significant (p = 0.004). In addition, men [I5 (21%) of 721 were significantly more often affected (p = 0.007) than women [five (6%) of 851. The degree of visual field loss, as indicated by the Esterman grid, showed a positive correlation with the duration of VGB medication. There was no correlation of visual field contraction with a history of meningitis as potential cause of the epilepsy, duration of the epilepsy, status epilepticus in the medical history, or histologic abnormality of the brain tissue removed. Ophthalmologic examination of the patients with concentric contraction revealed no abnormalities. None of the patients with concentric contraction complained spontaneously of their visual field loss.Conclusions: VGB medication is a causative factor in concentric visual field loss. Visual field examination of patients using VGB should be seriously considered.

No abstract

No abstract