Six painful hips in five patients were examined with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and were found to have diffuse signal abnormalities in the marrow of the femoral head and neck, which extended into the intertrochanteric area in five cases. The abnormal regions were low in signal intensity on images obtained with a short repetition time (TR) and a short echo time (TE) and were isointense or hyperintense on long TR/TE images--findings that have been attributed by others to bone marrow edema. Edema was also seen in marrow just above the acetabulum in two cases. No focal abnormalities characteristic of osteonecrosis were seen. Osteonecrosis was subsequently shown to be present in all six femoral heads at core biopsy (three cases) or by subsequent development of focal MR abnormalities reported to be highly specific for osteonecrosis (three cases). The affected hips had been radiographically normal or subtly osteopenic and had shown intense radionuclide uptake in the femoral head at scintigraphy, with lesser abnormality in the neck and intertrochanteric region. Follow-up MR examinations of five of the six femoral heads showed the diffuse abnormalities to have been transient. Although diffuse MR abnormalities in the proximal femur are not specific, they may indicate the presence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Magnetic resonance (MR) images and computed tomographic (CT) scans of histologically characterized soft-tissue masses of the locomotor system in 35 patients were compared for image contrast, demonstration of bone destruction, and display of extent and anatomic relationships of the masses. Subjective criteria for predicting malignancy were tested. T1 measurements were made in a few cases. Intensities of masses relative to those of fat and muscle in spin-echo T1-weighted and highly T2-weighted images were evaluated for correlation with tissue type. Subjective value of using coronal and sagittal images was assessed. Because of its superior inherent image contrast and its ability to provide direct sagittal and coronal images, MR was better than CT in demonstrating size and extent of most tumors and their relationships to vascular and nonvascular structures. However, bone destruction was more difficult to see with MR. Except for fatty tumors, MR was not helpful in identifying tissue type. Subjective criteria were of limited value in distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. Moreover, there is currently no credible evidence that T1 or T2 measurements are helpful in this regard. Study results suggest that MR is superior to CT in evaluating soft-tissue masses of the locomotor system. If an MR examination is performed, CT may not be necessary in certain cases unless bone involvement is suspected.
Eleven acutely injured knees and 13 normal knees were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to assess the value of this modality in detecting acute ligamentous injury of the knee. The presence of torn ligaments in the injured knees was determined by arthroscopy and/or arthrotomy in ten cases and clinical follow-up in one case. The anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments (ACL and PCL) were demonstrated by sagittal spin echo (SE) images through the intercondylar notch (TE = 30 ms; TR = 2,000 ms). The tibial and fibular collateral ligaments (TCL and FCL) were evaluated on coronal SE images (TE = 30 ms, TR = 200 or 530 ms; TE = 120 ms, TR = 2,000 or 2,120 ms). The ACL and PCL were considered torn on MR if they appeared disrupted or were not seen in their normal anatomical positions. The collateral ligaments were considered torn if abnormal high-intensity signal was noted in adjacent soft tissues on TE = 120 ms images or if disruption of a ligament was apparent. Eleven of 15 torn ligaments and 80 of 81 normal ligaments were correctly identified by these criteria. It is concluded that MR imaging may be useful in detecting acute injury of ligaments of the knee.
The radiologic assessment of patients suspected of having an aortic dissection must be based on an understanding of the treatment options and how these are to be employed in any clinical setting. The appropriate selection and timing of imaging studies is crucial. The diagnosis of dissection must be quickly confirmed, other diseases that mimic dissection must be excluded, and the type and extent of dissection must be established so that appropriate therapy can be instituted. Although computed tomography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and echocardiography greatly enhanced the ability to evaluate the aorta by noninvasive means, aortography remains the examination of choice for defining the vascular anatomy, especially when surgical intervention is considered. MR imaging may become the primary examination for the initial and subsequent evaluation of acute and chronic dissections as MR angiographic techniques improve and changes are made in monitoring equipment to allow the safe examination of acutely ill patients.
A major role of the radiologist in evaluating hepatic neoplasms is to assist the surgeon in determining the feasibility of hepatic resection. Disease confined to the liver must be accurately localized relative to important intrahepatic structures, particularly those that determine hepatic segmental anatomy [1 , 2]; moreover, extrahepatic spread must be defined if present. The first part of this essay reviews normal hepatic vascular anatomy and its relationship to segmental anatomy, as seen on CT, MR imaging, and sonography. Emphasis is placed on the formation of a three-dimensional concept of hepatic vascular and segmental anatomy. Such a concept is essential in real-time sonography, since the liver is imaged in nonorthogonal planes. Moreover, it enables the radiologist to take full advantage of sagittal and coronal images when evaluating the liver with MR imaging. Materials and MethodsWe selected CT, MR, and sonographic images that demonstrate normal anatomy to highlight vascular and segmental anatomy. The
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.