Cortical excitability can be modulated using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Previously, we showed that rTMS combined with cognitive training (rTMS-COG) has positive results in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The goal of this randomized double-blind, controlled study was to examine the safety and efficacy of rTMS-COG in AD. Fifteen AD patients received 1-h daily rTMS-COG or sham treatment (seven treated, eight placebo), five sessions/week for 6 weeks, followed by biweekly sessions for 3 months. The primary outcome was improvement of the cognitive score. The secondary outcome included improvement in the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). There was an improvement in the average ADAS-cog score of 3.76 points after 6 weeks in the treatment group compared to 0.47 in the placebo group and 3.52 points after 4.5 months of treatment, compared to worsening of 0.38 in the placebo (P = 0.04 and P = 0.05, respectively). There was also an improvement in the average CGIC score of 3.57 (after 6 weeks) and 3.67 points (after 4.5 months), compared to 4.25 and 4.29 in the placebo group (mild worsening) (P = 0.05 and P = 0.05, respectively). NPI improved non-significantly. In summary, the NeuroAD system offers a novel, safe and effective therapy for improving cognitive function in AD.

Inhibitors of MAO-A and MAO-B are in clinical use for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders respectively. Elucidation of the molecular structure of the active sites of the enzymes has enabled a precise determination of the way in which substrates and inhibitor molecules are metabolized, or inhibit metabolism of substrates, respectively. Despite the knowledge of the strong antidepressant efficacy of irreversible MAO inhibitors, their clinical use has been limited by their side effect of potentiation of the cardiovascular effects of dietary amines (“cheese effect”). A number of reversible MAO-A inhibitors which are devoid of cheese effect have been described in the literature, but only one, moclobemide, is currently in clinical use. The irreversible inhibitors of MAO-B, selegiline and rasagiline, are used clinically in treatment of Parkinson's disease, and a recently introduced reversible MAO-B inhibitor, safinamide, has also been found efficacious. Modification of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of selegiline by transdermal administration has led to the development of a new drug form for treatment of depression. The clinical potential of MAO inhibitors together with detailed knowledge of the enzyme's binding site structure should lead to future developments with these drugs.

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale (SPES)/SCales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease (SCOPA)-a short scale developed to assess motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: Eighty five patients with PD were assessed with the SPES/SCOPA, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale, and Schwab and England (S&E) scale. Thirty four patients were examined twice by two different assessors who were blinded to each other's scores and test executions. Additionally, six items of the motor section of the SPES/SCOPA were assessed in nine patients and recorded on videotape to evaluate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Results: The reproducibility of the sum scores in the clinical assessments was high for all subscales of the SPES/SCOPA. Inter-rater reliability coefficients for individual items ranged from 0.27-0.83 in the motor impairment section, from 0.58-0.82 in the activities of daily living section, and from 0.65-0.92 in the motor complications section. Inter-rater reliability of the motor items in the video assessments ranged from 0.70-0.87 and intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.81-0.95. The correlation between related subscales of the SPES/SCOPA and UPDRS were all higher than 0.85, and both scales revealed similar correlations with other measures of disease severity. The mean time to complete the scales differed significantly (p,0.001) and measured 8.1 (SD 1.9) minutes for the SPES/SCOPA and 15.6 (SD 3.6) minutes for the UPDRS. Conclusion: The SPES/SCOPA is a short, reliable, and valid scale that can adequately be used in both research and clinical practice. O ver the past 15 years the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) has become a standard tool in the clinical evaluation of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The UPDRS is the most frequently used scale in PD trials 1 and has acceptable inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for most items.2 3 The construct validity with other scales is adequate but the content validity has been questioned, especially with respect to its conceptual clearness and balance between items that represent symptoms responsive to dopaminergic treatment and those more resistant to this intervention.2 Other critiques include the length of the scale 4 and the redundancy of items. 5 The mean time to complete the scale is about 17 minutes for experienced users, 4 which makes it less suitable for clinical application. Van Hilten et al 5 demonstrated that the UPDRS can be shortened by removing redundant items from the motor section and conceptually unclear items from the activities of daily living (ADL) section without negative consequences for reliability or validity. A shorter scale with similar clinimetric properties may have advantages for patients, clinicians, and researchers.As a result of the aforementioned considerations, the Short Parkinson's Evaluation Scale (SPES) was developed.6 This scale is short, conceptually clear, and displays good reliabili...

Motor complications in Parkinson’s disease (PD) result from the short half-life and irregular plasma fluctuations of oral levodopa. When strategies of providing more continuous dopaminergic stimulation by adjusting oral medication fail, patients may be candidates for one of three device-aided therapies: deep brain stimulation (DBS), continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion, or continuous duodenal/jejunal levodopa/carbidopa pump infusion (DLI). These therapies differ in their invasiveness, side-effect profile, and the need for nursing care. So far, very few comparative studies have evaluated the efficacy of the three device-aided therapies for specific motor problems in advanced PD. As a result, neurologists currently lack guidance as to which therapy could be most appropriate for a particular PD patient. A group of experts knowledgeable in all three therapies reviewed the currently available literature for each treatment and identified variables of clinical relevance for choosing one of the three options such as type of motor problems, age, and cognitive and psychiatric status. For each scenario, pragmatic and (if available) evidence-based recommendations are provided as to which patients could be candidates for either DBS, DLI, or subcutaneous apomorphine.