The mechanism of action of hypersensitivity reactions from paclitaxel has not been fully understood. It has not even been defined if they are secondary to paclitaxel, its vehicle or the premedication. Postmarketing pharmacovigilance is predominantly based on spontaneous reporting. These reports albeit biased and incomplete serve to detect previously unrecognised adverse events. We report a life threatening adverse event related to paclitaxel without any evidence of histamine release. It consisted of a cardiac arrest probably secondary to bradiarrhythmia or branch block.
Background Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) face complications of medical treatment that may compromise their health and the drugs’ therapeutic success. Real world data regarding adverse drug reactions (ADR) is crucial. Methods Unicentric retrospective study. All patients followed for IBD in a tertiary Portuguese hospital between 2015–2021 were included. Results 328 patients included-55.8% women; age at last follow-up 53.4±16.7 years old; Crohn’s Disease (CD) in 53.0%; follow-up of 15.8±10.8years. Extraintestinal manifestations(EIM) occurred in 13.1%(n=43) patients, mostly arthropathy/arthritis(n=33). Current or previous treatment included salicylates in 69.5%, thiopurines 63.1%, corticosteroids 54.3%, methotrexate 5.5%, infliximab 38.4%, adalimumab 11.6%, ustekinumab 4.9% and vedolizumab 4.6%. In total, 124 ADR occurred in 97 patients(28.7%). ADR occurred with salicylates in 20/228 patients(8.8%), corresponding to 9/215 of mesalazine and 10/26 of salazopyrin treated patients, mostly gastrointestinal(GI) intolerance(n=8). ADR occurred in 78/207(37.7%) of thiopurine-treated patients; 5 had more than one ADR to thiopurines and 10 developed ADR despite change from azathioprine to 6-mercaptopurine. Reactions included myelosuppression(n=21), GI symptoms(n=20), pancreatitis(n=8). One case of corticosteroid ADR was reported (psychosis). 4/18(22,2%) methotrexate-treated patients experienced ADR, all liver toxicity. Infliximab-associated ADR occurred in 20/126 patients(6.1%), namely infusion reactions(n=7) or lupus-like syndrome(LLS) (n=6). 9/39 adalimumab-treated patients experienced ADR, such as skin rash(n=3). No reported ADR with ustekinumab or vedolizumab. Overall, ADR led to dose adjustments in 100/120 cases and to drug suspension in 22. Nine patients needed hospital admission and one died with squamous cell carcinoma in fistula tracts. 94.9% of these ADR remitted. In the univariate analysis, ADR were associated with IBD type(p=0.040), EIM(p=0.001), UC extent(p=0.016), thiopurine(p<0.001), infliximab(p<0.001) and adalimumab (p=0.005) exposure. In multivariate analysis, significance was kept with EIM(p=0.003), thioupurine(p=0.006) and infliximab(p=0.003) exposure. Patients who had one ADR, were not more likely to have ADR with other drugs. Conclusion ADR occurred in 28.7% of IBD patients and the most commonly implicated drugs were salazopyrin (10/26, 38.5% of patients) and thiopurines (75/207, 36.2%), rates much higher than those found with mesalazine and biologics. Nevertheless, most of these reactions resolved with dose adjustments or drug suspension, without hospital admission. This indicates that drugs available for IBD treatment remain safe, but their use must be cautious and toxicities should be monitored.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.