1. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the response to imipramine treatment in enuretic children through the use of a series of clinical and pharmacological variables and by applying a multivariate (principal components) analysis technique. 2. The study was carried out on 146 children whose ages ranged from 5 to 14 years, and who received variable doses of imipramine (12.5 to 100 mg day‐1). 3. The quantitative variables analyzed were: drug dosage, serum levels of imipramine and its metabolite desipramine, the relationship between them both, the duration of treatment, age and weight. 4. The qualitative variables were: compliance, presence of side‐effects, enuretic and/or psychiatric antecedents, intelligence quotient (I.Q.), the existence (or absence) of related pathologies, sex, and the type of enuresis. 5. The response to treatment was quantified by means of the percentage of decrease in frequency of enuresis as compared with the initial frequency. 6. The results obtained show that the variables which are most associated with the reduction of enuresis are, in decreasing order: the dosage of imipramine administered, the duration of treatment, compliance and the level/dose ratio for the sum of the drug and metabolite levels.
The aim of this study was to establish the performance of pharmacokinetic methods employing little data on serum drug concentrations obtained in routine therapeutic drug monitoring of imipramine. Forty-three and 123 serum levels were obtained in 8 adult depressive patients (aged 57–80 y) and 34 enuretic children (aged 5–13 y), respectively. Forecasting of the serum concentrations was performed based on mean population pharmacokinetic parameters (method A), with knowledge of one steady-state serum concentration (method B), and from two or more steady-state serum concentrations (method C). The accuracy and precision of each method were evaluated from the mean prediction error (ME) and from the root mean squared prediction error (RMSE), respectively. The values of ME and RMSE of methods B and C proved to be significantly lower than those found using method A. Method C was the most precise and accurate in both populations. Method A underestimates the serum concentrations observed in adults (ME >0) but overestimates them in children (ME <0), although to a lesser extent. The study shows that it is possible to obtain a good estimation of individual dosage needs from one or more serum concentrations obtained at steady state. Clinical application of these methods (B and C) yields an increase in the efficiency and safety of the treatment, particularly in special populations such as geriatric and pediatric patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.