Two simple pilot procedures are proposed for avoiding the problem of dealing with a disconnected experimental design. Both procedures should be carried out on the selected design before any experimentation is considered. The first procedure is a check that the suggested design is connected with respect to treatments. This makes use of the information matrix for the model and provides feed-back on a disconnected design. The second procedure specifies which observations are influential in causing a connected design to become disconnected, with respect to any set of parameter effects, if these observations are lost during the experimental period. This specification is found by examining the projection matrix for the model. These pilot procedures are illustrated by several examples. Copyright 2004 Royal Statistical Society.

SummaryCriteria are proposed for assessing the robustness of a binary block design against the loss of whole blocks, based on summing elements of selected upper non-principal sections of the concurrence matrix, which improve on the minimal concurrence concept that has been used previously and provide new conditions for measuring the robustness status of a design. The robustness properties of two-associate partially balanced designs are considered and it is shown that two categories of group divisible designs are maximally robust. These results expand a classic result in the literature, obtained by Ghosh, which established maximal robustness for the class of balanced block designs.

No abstract

Summary The arrangement of 2n‐factorials in row–column designs to estimate main effects and two‐factor interactions is investigated. Single‐replicate constructions are given which enable estimation of all main effects and maximize the number of estimable two‐factor interactions. Constructions and guidance are given for multireplicate designs in single arrays and in multiple arrays. Consideration is given to constructions for 2n−t fractional factorials.

Manual digital timing devices such as stopwatches are ubiquitous in the education sector for experimental work where automated electronic timing is unavailable or impractical. The disadvantage of manual timing is that the experimenter introduces an additional systematic error and random uncertainty to a measurement that hitherto could only be approximated and which masks useful information on uncertainty due to variations in the physical conditions of the experiment. A model for the reaction time of a timekeeper using a stopwatch for a single anticipated visual stimulus of the type encountered in physics experiments is obtained from a set of 4304 reaction times from timekeepers at swimming competitions. The reaction time is found to be well modelled by the normal distribution N (, σ 2) = N (0.11, 0.07 2) in units of seconds where and σ 2 are the systematic error and variance for a single time measurement. Consistency between timekeepers is shown to be very good. The reaction time for a stopwatch-operated start and stop experiment can therefore be modelled by N (0, 0.10 2), assuming that the average reaction time is the same in both cases. This makes a significant contribution to the uncertainty of most manually-timed measurements. This timing uncertainty can be subtracted out of the variation observed in repeat measurements in the real experiment to reveal the uncertainty solely associated with fluctuations in the physical conditions of the experiment.