ObjectivesTo develop recommendations for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) manifestations. Methods The authors compiled questions on prevalence and risk factors, diagnosis and monitoring, therapy and prognosis of NPSLE. A systematic literature search was performed and evidence was categorised based on sample size and study design. Results Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are at increased risk of several neuropsychiatric manifestations. Common (cumulative incidence >5%) manifestations include cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and seizures; relatively uncommon (1-5%) are severe cognitive dysfunction, major depression, acute confusional state (ACS), peripheral nervous disorders psychosis. Strong risk factors (at least fi vefold increased risk) are previous or concurrent severe NPSLE (for cognitive dysfunction, seizures) and antiphospholipid antibodies (for CVD, seizures, chorea). The diagnostic work-up of suspected NPSLE is comparable to that in patients without SLE who present with the same manifestations, and aims to exclude causes unrelated to SLE. Investigations include cerebrospinal fl uid analysis (to exclude central nervous system infection), EEG (to diagnose seizure disorder), neuropsychological tests (to assess cognitive dysfunction), nerve conduction studies (for peripheral neuropathy) and MRI (T1/T2, fl uid-attenuating inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging, enhanced T1 sequence). Glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive therapy are indicated when NPSLE is thought to refl ect an infl ammatory process (optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, peripheral neuropathy, refractory seizures, psychosis, ACS) and in the presence of generalised lupus activity. Antiplatelet/anticoagulation therapy is indicated when manifestations are related to antiphospholipid antibodies, particularly thrombotic CVD. Conclusions Neuropsychiatric manifestations in SLE patients should be fi rst evaluated and treated as in patients without SLE, and secondarily attributed to SLE and treated accordingly. involve the central and the peripheral nervous system and that range from overt manifestations such as stroke, seizures and psychosis, to more subtle abnormalities of cognitive function (see supplementary table S1, available online only). Multiple pathological mechanisms are implicated in NPSLE, including antiphospholipid or other autoantibodymediated vascular or neuronal injury, intrathecal production of infl ammatory mediators and accelerated atherosclerosis. Despite substantial advances in the understanding of lupus, NPSLE continues to pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges to practising physicians. The indicated diagnostic work-up remains unclear, therapies are empiric, and the prognosis after an neuropsychiatric event is often diffi cult to determine. We sought to develop recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients presenting with neuropsychiatric manifestations using an evidencebased approach followed by exper...

Objective: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex disease with variable presentations, course and prognosis. We sought to develop evidence-based recommendations addressing the major issues in the management of SLE. Methods: The EULAR Task Force on SLE comprised 19 specialists and a clinical epidemiologist. Key questions for the management of SLE were compiled using the Delphi technique. A systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane Library Reports was performed using McMaster/Hedges clinical queries' strategies for questions related to the diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring and treatment of SLE. For neuropsychiatric, pregnancy and antiphospholipid syndrome questions, the search was conducted using an array of relevant terms. Evidence was categorised based on sample size and type of design, and the categories of available evidence were identified for each recommendation. The strength of recommendation was assessed based on the category of available evidence, and agreement on the statements was measured across the 19 specialists. Results: Twelve questions were generated regarding the prognosis, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of SLE, including neuropsychiatric SLE, pregnancy, the antiphospholipid syndrome and lupus nephritis. The evidence to support each proposition was evaluated and scored. After discussion and votes, the final recommendations were presented using brief statements. The average agreement among experts was 8.8 out of 10. Conclusion: Recommendations for the management of SLE were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus with high level of agreement among the experts.Approximately half a million people in Europe and a quarter of a million people in the USA (projections based on prevalence rates of 30-50 per 100 000) have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).1 The great majority of these patients are women in their childbearing years. SLE is a complex disease with variable presentations, course and prognosis characterised by remissions and flares.2 3 Because of the systemic nature of the disease, multiple medical specialties are involved in the care of these patients. To avoid fragmentation and optimise management, there is a presently unmet need to establish an integrated approach based on widely accepted principles and evidencebased recommendations.Recommendations and/or guidelines represent a popular way of integrating evidence-based medicine to clinical practice. These are systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate healthcare for specific clinical circumstances. 4 To this end and under the auspices of EULAR, we undertook the task of developing guidelines for the management of various aspects of SLE. To ensure a high level of intrinsic quality and comparability of this approach, we used the EULAR standard operating procedures. 5 We present here 12 key recommendations, selected from a panel of experts, for the management (diagnosis, treatment, monitoring) of SLE using a combination of research-based...

No abstract

Background: Mothers with anti-SSA/Ro antibodies who have had a previous fetus with congenital heart block (CHB) have a risk of recurrence estimated to be up to 16%. Objective: To improve the management of these "high risk patients" by determining (a) whether or not prophylactic treatment is efficient; (b) whether or not fluorinated steroids (betametasone and dexamethasone) that do cross the placenta in an active form are safe for the fetus; and (c) which prophylactic treatment should be used. Methods: Retrospective study performed on seven mothers sent to a university hospital owing to a past history of one (six mothers) or two children (one mother) with CHB. Results: 13 subsequent pregnancies occurred. No CHB was observed. All four pregnancies in women treated with 10 mg/day prednisone were uneventful. Three pregnancies in women receiving no steroids resulted in two early spontaneous abortions and one live birth. The six pregnancies in women treated with dexamethasone (4-5 mg/day) ended in one early and one late spontaneous abortion, two stillbirths, and two live births with intrauterine growth restriction and mild adrenal insufficiency. A histological study of one stillbirth disclosed intrauterine growth restriction and marked adrenal hypoplasia. Conclusion: Adverse obstetric outcomes were often seen here and major concerns have been raised by paediatricians about the safety of fluorinated steroids, owing to the results of animals studies, retrospective data, and randomised trials. Because fluorinated steroids have not been shown to improve prophylactic treatment of CHB in pregnant women at high risk, their use is questionable.