Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (SBTKA) may present a higher risk for postoperative complications than unilateral surgery. The authors retrospectively identified 561 patients who underwent SBTKA between 2013 and 2015. The cohort was stratified according to the following appropriateness of care criteria (AOCC): (1) age younger than 70 years; (2) absence of cardiac disease; (3) controlled diabetes; and (4) body mass index less than 30 kg/m. The authors created an AOCC score, with 0 representing the most ideal candidates and 4 representing the least ideal candidates. The cohort included 140 (25%) ideal candidates with a score of 0; the cohort also included 299 (53%) non-ideal candidates with a score of 1, 105 (19%) with a score of 2, 14 (2%) with a score of 3, and 3 (1%) with a score of 4. Ideal candidates had the shortest mean length of stay at 3.6±1.2 days. Length of stay was longer for patients with an AOCC score of greater than 2 compared with those with an AOCC score of 2 or less (5.2±4.3 vs 3.8±1.6 days, P<.001). Ideal candidates were discharged to home more often than other patients (26% vs 13%, P<.001). Although there was no difference in 90-day all-cause complications between ideal and non-ideal candidates (13% vs 16%, P=.400), medical complications trended strongly (6% vs 11%, P=.086). Appropriateness of care criteria for SBTKA patients were associated with shorter length of stay, higher rates of home discharge, and a trend toward lower complication rates. Simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty can offer better outcomes in a subgroup of patients appropriately selected for surgery. Physicians can use these results to counsel their patients about risks and benefits of undergoing SBTKA. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):293-298.].
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.