In most meteorological or hydrological models, the distinction between snow and rain is based only on a given air temperature. However, other factors such as air moisture can be used to better distinguish between the two phases. In this study, a number of models using different combinations of meteorological variables are tested to determine their pertinence for the discrimination of precipitation phases. Spatial robustness is also evaluated. Thirty years (1981–2010) of Swiss meteorological data are used, consisting of radio soundings from Payerne as well as present weather observations and surface measurements (mean hourly surface air temperature, mean hourly relative humidity, and hourly precipitation) from 14 stations, including Payerne. It appeared that, unlike surface variables, variables derived from the atmospheric profiles (e.g., the vertical temperature gradient) hardly improve the discrimination of precipitation phase at ground level. Among all tested variables, surface air temperature and relative humidity show the greatest explanatory power. The statistical model using these two variables and calibrated for the case study region provides good spatial robustness over the region. Its parameters appear to confirm those defined in the model presented by Koistinen and Saltikoff.
High-resolution weather scenarios generated for climate change impact studies from the output of climate models must be spatially consistent. Analog models (AMs) offer a high potential for the generation of such scenarios. For each prediction day, the scenario they provide is the weather observed for days in a historical archive that are analogous according to different predictors. When the same ''analog date'' is chosen for a prediction at several sites, spatial consistency is automatically satisfied. The optimal predictors and consequently the optimal analog dates, however, are expected to depend on the location for which the prediction is to be made.In the present work, the predictor (1000-and 500-hPa geopotential heights) domain of a benchmark AM is optimized for the probabilistic daily prediction of 8981 local precipitation ''stations'' over France. The corresponding 8981 locally domain-optimized AMs are used to explore the spatial transferability and similarity of the optimal analog dates obtained for different locations. Whereas the similarity is very low even when the locations are close, the spatial transferability of the optimal analog dates for a given location is high. When they are used for the prediction at all other locations, the loss of prediction performance is therefore very low over large spatial domains (up to 500 km). Spatial transferability is lower in the presence of high mountains. It also depends on the parameters of the AM (e.g., its archive length, predictors, and number of analog dates used for the prediction). In the present case, AMs with higher prediction skill exhibit lower transferability.
Heavy-rainfall events are common in southern France and frequently result in devastating flash floods. Thus, an appropriate anticipation of future rainfall is required: for early flood warning, at least 12-24 h in advance; for alerting operational services, at least 2-3 days ahead. Precipitation forecasts are generally provided by numerical weather prediction models (NWP), and their associated uncertainty is generally estimated through an ensemble approach. Precipitation forecasts also have to be adapted to hydrological scales. This study describes an alternative approach to commonly used limited-area models. Probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) are provided through an analog sorting technique, which directly links synoptic-scale NWP output to catchment-scale rainfall probability distributions. One issue concerns the latest developments in implementing a daily version of this technique into operational conditions. It is shown that the obtained PQPFs depend on the meteorological forecasts used for selecting analogous days and that the method has to be reoptimized when changing the source of synoptic forecasts, because of the NWP output uncertainties. Second, an evaluation of the PQPFs demonstrates that the analog technique performs well for early warning of heavy-rainfall events and provides useful information as potential input to a hydrological ensemble prediction system. It is shown that the obtained daily rainfall distributions can be unreliable. A statistical correction of the observed bias is proposed as a function of the no-rain frequency values, leading to a significant improvement in PQPF sharpness.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.