New Au@SnO2 yolk-shell nanospheres have been successfully synthesized by using Au@SiO2 nanospheres as sacrificial templates. This process is environmentally friendly and is based on hydrothermal shell-by-shell deposition of polycrystalline SnO2 on spheriform Au@SiO2 nanotemplates. Au nanoparticles can be impregnated into the SnO2 nanospheres and the nanospheres show outer diameters of 110 nm and thicknesses of 15 nm. The possible growth model of the nanospheres is proposed. The gas sensing properties of the Au@SnO2 yolk-shell nanospheres were researched and compared with that of the hollow SnO2 nanospheres. The former shows lower operating temperature (210 °C), lower detection limit (5 ppm), faster response (0.3 s) and better selectivity. These improved sensing properties were attributed to the catalytic effect of Au, and enhanced electron depletion at the surface of the Au@SnO2 yolk-shell nanospheres.
Background: Shotgun metagenomics based on untargeted sequencing can explore the taxonomic profile and the function of unknown microorganisms in samples, and complement the shortage of amplicon sequencing. Binning assembled sequences into individual groups, which represent microbial genomes, is the key step and a major challenge in metagenomic research. Both supervised and unsupervised machine learning methods have been employed in binning. Genome binning belonging to unsupervised method clusters contigs into individual genome bins by machine learning methods without the assistance of any reference databases. So far a lot of genome binning tools have emerged. Evaluating these genome tools is of great significance to microbiological research. In this study, we evaluate 15 genome binning tools containing 12 original binning tools and 3 refining binning tools by comparing the performance of these tools on chicken gut metagenomic datasets and the first CAMI challenge datasets. Results: For chicken gut metagenomic datasets, original genome binner MetaBat, Groopm2 and Autometa performed better than other original binner, and MetaWrap combined the binning results of them generated the most high-quality genome bins. For CAMI datasets, Groopm2 achieved the highest purity (> 0.9) with good completeness (> 0.8), and reconstructed the most high-quality genome bins among original genome binners. Compared with Groopm2, MetaBat2 had similar performance with higher completeness and lower purity. Genome refining binners DASTool predicated the most high-quality genome bins among all genomes binners. Most genome binner performed well for unique strains. Nonetheless, reconstructing common strains still is a substantial challenge for all genome binner. Conclusions: In conclusion, we tested a set of currently available, state-of-the-art metagenomics hybrid binning tools and provided a guide for selecting tools for metagenomic binning by comparing range of purity, completeness, adjusted rand index, and the number of high-quality reconstructed bins. Furthermore, available information for future binning strategy were concluded.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.