The title phosphanegold(I) thiolate, C26H22AuFNOPS or [Au(C8H7FNOS)(C18H15P)], has the AuI centre coordinated by phosphane-P [2.2494 (8) Å] and thiolate-S [2.3007 (8) Å] atoms to define a close to linear geometry [P—Au—S = 176.10 (3)°]. The thiolate ligand is orientated so that the methoxy-O atom is directed towards the Au atom, forming an Au...O close contact of 2.986 (2) Å. In the crystal, a variety of intermolecular contacts are discerned with fluorobenzene-C—H...O(methoxy) and phenyl-C—H...F interactions leading to dimeric aggregates. These are assembled into a three-dimensional architecture by phenyl-C—H...S(thiolate) and phenyl-C—H...π(fluorobenzene, phenyl) interactions. Accordingly, the analysis of the calculated Hirshfeld surface shows 30.8% of all contacts are of the type C...H/H...C but this is less than the H...H contacts, at 44.9%. Other significant contributions to the surface come from H...F/F...H [8.1%], H...S/S...H [6.9%] and H...O/O...H [3.2%] contacts. Two major stabilization energies have contributions from the phenyl-C—H...π(fluorobenzene) and fluorobenzene-C—H...C(imine) interactions (−37.2 kcal mol−1), and from the fluorobenzene-C—H...F and phenyl-C—H...O interactions (−34.9 kcal mol−1), the latter leading to the dimeric aggregate.

The title compound, C13H19NO8, is based on a tetra-substituted pyrrolidine ring, which has a twisted conformation about the central C—C bond; the Cm—Ca—Ca—Cme torsion angle is 38.26 (15)° [m = methylcarboxylate, a = acetyloxy and me = methylene]. While the N-bound ethylcarboxylate group occupies an equatorial position, the remaining substituents occupy axial positions. In the crystal, supramolecular double-layers are formed by weak methyl- and methylene-C—H...O(carbonyl) interactions involving all four carbonyl-O atoms. The two-dimensional arrays stack along the c axis without directional interactions between them. The Hirshfeld surface is dominated by H...H (55.7%) and H...C/C...H (37.0%) contacts; H...H contacts are noted in the inter-double-layer region. The interaction energy calculations point to the importance of the dispersion energy term in the stabilization of the crystal.

The title compound, C23H24N2O9, is a tetra-substituted pyrrolidine derivative with a twisted conformation, with the twist evident in the C—C bond bearing the adjacent acetyloxy substituents. These are flanked on one side by a C-bound 4-methoxyphenyl group and on the other by a methylene group. The almost sp 2-N atom [sum of angles = 357°] bears a 4-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl substituent. In the crystal, ring-methylene-C—H...O(acetyloxy-carbonyl) and methylene-C—H...O(carbonyl) interactions lead to supramolecular layers lying parallel to (\overline{1}01); the layers stack without directional interactions between them. The analysis of the calculated Hirshfeld surfaces indicates the combined importance of H...H (42.3%), H...O/O...H (37.3%) and H...C/C...H (14.9%) surface contacts. Further, the interaction energies, largely dominated by the dispersive term, point to the stabilizing influence of H...H and O...O contacts in the inter-layer region.

C12H17N3S, monoclinic, P21/c (no. 14), a = 9.3084(19) Å, b = 7.9523(16) Å, c = 16.905(3) Å, β = 92.26(3)°, V = 1250.4(4) Å3, Z = 4, Rgt(F) = 0.0330, wRref(F2) = 0.0914, T = 100(2) K.

X-ray crystallography on [EtOC(=O)N(H)C(=N+H2)NH2]Cl·½H2O (1) shows the asymmetric unit to comprise two independent cations, two chloride anions and crystal water. The main conformational difference between the cations is seen in the relative orientation of the ethyl groups; geometry-optimisation confirms the all-trans conformation is the most stable. The remaining parts of the cations are co-planar and feature intramolecular N–H···O(carbonyl) hydrogen bonds. An analysis of the C–N bonds suggests substantial delocalisation of the positive charge over the CN3 atoms. In the crystal, columns comprising the first independent cation are surrounded by four columns of the second cation within a network of water-O–H···Cl, N–H···Cl and N–H···O(water, carbonyl) hydrogen bonds, many of which are charge-assisted. The packing has been further investigated by Hirshfeld surface analysis, molecular electrostatic potential and interaction energy calculations. The charge-assisted N–H···Cl hydrogen bonds are significantly stronger than the water-O–H···Cl interactions consistent the distribution of the positive charge over the CN3 atoms.

The title zinc bis(thiosemicarbazone) complex, [Zn(C22H17N4O2S)2], comprises two N,S-donor anions, leading to a distorted tetrahedral N2S2 donor set. The resultant five-membered chelate rings are nearly planar and form a dihedral angle of 73.28 (3)°. The configurations about the endocyclic- and exocyclic-imine bonds are Z and E, respectively, and that about the ethylene bond is E. The major differences in the conformations of the ligands are seen in the dihedral angles between the chelate ring and nitrobenzene rings [40.48 (6) cf. 13.18 (4)°] and the N-bound phenyl and nitrobenzene ring [43.23 (8) and 22.64 (4)°]. In the crystal, a linear supramolecular chain along the b-axis direction features amine-N—H...O(nitro) hydrogen bonding. The chains assemble along the 21-screw axis through a combination of phenyl-C—H...O(nitro) and π(chelate ring)–π(phenyl) contacts. The double chains are linked into a three-dimensional architecture through phenyl-C—H...O(nitro) and nitro-O...π(phenyl) interactions.

The title CuII macrocyclic complex salt tetrahydrate, [Cu(C22H46N6O2)](C2H3O2)2·4H2O, sees the metal atom located on a centre of inversion and coordinated within a 4 + 2 (N4O2) tetragonally distorted coordination geometry; the N atoms are derived from the macrocycle and the O atoms from weakly associated [3.2048 (15) Å] acetate anions. Further stability to the three-ion aggregate is provided by intramolecular amine-N—H...O(carboxylate) hydrogen bonds. Hydrogen bonding is also prominent in the molecular packing with amide-N—H...O(amide) interactions, leading to eight-membered {...HNCO}2 synthons, amide-N—H...O(water), water-O—H...O(carboxylate) and water-O—H...O(water) hydrogen bonds featuring within the three-dimensional architecture. The calculated Hirshfeld surfaces for the individual components of the asymmetric unit differentiate the water molecules owing to their distinctive supramolecular association. For each of the anion and cation, H...H contacts predominate (50.7 and 65.2%, respectively) followed by H...O/O...H contacts (44.5 and 29.9%, respectively).

C26H36N6O2S2Zn, triclinic, P1̄ (no. 2), a = 9.1777(5) Å, b = 12.3828(7) Å, c = 13.3137(7) Å, α = 102.157(5)°, β = 101.395(4)°, γ = 100.771(4)°, V = 1408.14(14) Å3, Z = 2, Rgt(F) = 0.0489, wRref(F2) = 0.1147, T = 100(2) K.